View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Positive and problematic dissertation experiences: The faculty perspective.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Positive and problematic dissertation experiences: The faculty perspective.
Authors: Knox, Sarah (AUTHOR), Burkard, Alan W. (AUTHOR), Janecek, Julie (AUTHOR), Pruitt, Nathan T. (AUTHOR), Fuller, Shauna L. (AUTHOR), Hill, Clara E. (AUTHOR)
Source: Counselling Psychology Quarterly. Mar2011, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p55-69. 15p. 2 Charts.
Subjects: Clinical psychology, Content analysis, Counseling, Academic dissertations, Educational counseling, Educators, Interviewing, Research methodology, Statistical sampling, Social role, Sound recordings, Students, Teacher-student relationships, Teacher attitudes, Qualitative research, Doctoral programs, Occupational roles
Geographic Terms: Canada, United States
Abstract: We interviewed 14 clinical and counseling psychology faculty regarding their experiences chairing positive and problematic dissertations. Data were analyzed using consensual qualitative research (CQR). Participants reported that advisors' roles involved guiding/facilitating dissertations and helping students shape research ideas; students' roles included taking responsibility, working independently, and maintaining good relationships with the chair/committee. With positive dissertation experiences, chairs and students collaborated before the dissertation, worked together well during the dissertation, and students began the dissertation feeling competent and motivated; such dissertations positively affected participants. Problematic dissertation experiences evinced difficult relationships between chair and student, and students' low research capability; such dissertations negatively affected participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Counselling Psychology Quarterly is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 59835885
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Positive and problematic dissertation experiences: The faculty perspective.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Knox%2C+Sarah%22">Knox, Sarah</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burkard%2C+Alan+W%2E%22">Burkard, Alan W.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Janecek%2C+Julie%22">Janecek, Julie</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pruitt%2C+Nathan+T%2E%22">Pruitt, Nathan T.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fuller%2C+Shauna+L%2E%22">Fuller, Shauna L.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hill%2C+Clara+E%2E%22">Hill, Clara E.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Counselling+Psychology+Quarterly%22">Counselling Psychology Quarterly</searchLink>. Mar2011, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p55-69. 15p. 2 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+psychology%22">Clinical psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Content+analysis%22">Content analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Counseling%22">Counseling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+dissertations%22">Academic dissertations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+counseling%22">Educational counseling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educators%22">Educators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+sampling%22">Statistical sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+role%22">Social role</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sound+recordings%22">Sound recordings</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Students%22">Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher-student+relationships%22">Teacher-student relationships</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+attitudes%22">Teacher attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Doctoral+programs%22">Doctoral programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Occupational+roles%22">Occupational roles</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Canada%22">Canada</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: We interviewed 14 clinical and counseling psychology faculty regarding their experiences chairing positive and problematic dissertations. Data were analyzed using consensual qualitative research (CQR). Participants reported that advisors' roles involved guiding/facilitating dissertations and helping students shape research ideas; students' roles included taking responsibility, working independently, and maintaining good relationships with the chair/committee. With positive dissertation experiences, chairs and students collaborated before the dissertation, worked together well during the dissertation, and students began the dissertation feeling competent and motivated; such dissertations positively affected participants. Problematic dissertation experiences evinced difficult relationships between chair and student, and students' low research capability; such dissertations negatively affected participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Counselling Psychology Quarterly is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=59835885
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/09515070.2011.559796
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 55
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Clinical psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Content analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Counseling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic dissertations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational counseling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educators
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical sampling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social role
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sound recordings
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher-student relationships
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Doctoral programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Occupational roles
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Canada
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Positive and problematic dissertation experiences: The faculty perspective.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Knox, Sarah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Burkard, Alan W.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Janecek, Julie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pruitt, Nathan T.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fuller, Shauna L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hill, Clara E.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Text: Mar2011
              Type: published
              Y: 2011
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09515070
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 24
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Counselling Psychology Quarterly
              Type: main
ResultId 1