Curriculum Predictors of Performance on the Major Field Test in Psychology II.
Saved in:
| Title: | Curriculum Predictors of Performance on the Major Field Test in Psychology II. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Frazier, Thomas W., Edmonds, Christopher L. |
| Source: | Journal of Instructional Psychology. Mar2002, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p29. 4p. |
| Subjects: | College students, Psychology, Curriculum |
| Abstract: | In an era of increased scrutiny for scarce college resources and the desire to evaluate our curriculum against other programs, we undertook an objective evaluation of our psychology curriculum. The purpose of this study was to examine our undergraduate psychology curriculum to determine which courses predicted performance on a national outcome measure, the Major Field Test in Psychology II (MFTP), and to compare our graduates against national norms. A simple regression analysis of grades in core psychology courses against the total MFTP score was conducted. Results of the analysis revealed that only the research methods course predicted the total MFTP score (p < .001). Furthermore. a one sample t-test of the students' scores against the national mean for administrations in 1995–1998 revealed that there was no significant difference between our students' performance and the national norm (p = .771). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Instructional Psychology is the property of Educational Innovations and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 6432932 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Curriculum Predictors of Performance on the Major Field Test in Psychology II. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Frazier%2C+Thomas+W%2E%22">Frazier, Thomas W.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Edmonds%2C+Christopher+L%2E%22">Edmonds, Christopher L.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Instructional+Psychology%22">Journal of Instructional Psychology</searchLink>. Mar2002, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p29. 4p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+students%22">College students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology%22">Psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum%22">Curriculum</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: In an era of increased scrutiny for scarce college resources and the desire to evaluate our curriculum against other programs, we undertook an objective evaluation of our psychology curriculum. The purpose of this study was to examine our undergraduate psychology curriculum to determine which courses predicted performance on a national outcome measure, the Major Field Test in Psychology II (MFTP), and to compare our graduates against national norms. A simple regression analysis of grades in core psychology courses against the total MFTP score was conducted. Results of the analysis revealed that only the research methods course predicted the total MFTP score (p < .001). Furthermore. a one sample t-test of the students' scores against the national mean for administrations in 1995–1998 revealed that there was no significant difference between our students' performance and the national norm (p = .771). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Instructional Psychology is the property of Educational Innovations and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=6432932 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 4 StartPage: 29 Subjects: – SubjectFull: College students Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychology Type: general – SubjectFull: Curriculum Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Curriculum Predictors of Performance on the Major Field Test in Psychology II. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Frazier, Thomas W. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Edmonds, Christopher L. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2002 Type: published Y: 2002 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00941956 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 29 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Instructional Psychology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
