View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

A randomised controlled trial of the use of a piece of commercial software for the acquisition of reading skills.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A randomised controlled trial of the use of a piece of commercial software for the acquisition of reading skills.
Authors: Khan, MuhammadAhmad (AUTHOR), Gorard, Stephen (AUTHOR)
Source: Educational Review. Feb2012, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p21-35. 15p. 4 Charts.
Subjects: Computer assisted instruction software, Reading ability testing in secondary schools, Classroom activities, Randomized controlled trials, Schools, Education policy
Geographic Terms: Northern England, England
Abstract: We report here the overall results of a cluster randomised controlled trial of the use of computer-aided instruction with 672 Year 7 pupils in 23 secondary school classes in the north of England. A new piece of commercial software, claimed on the basis of publisher testing to be effective in improving reading after just six weeks of use in the classroom, was compared over 10 weeks (one term) with standard practice in literacy provision. Pupil literacy was assessed before and after the trial, via another piece of commercial software testing precisely the kinds of skills covered by the pedagogical software. Both the treatment group and the comparison group improved their tested literacy. In a sense the publisher’s claim was justified. However, the comparison group improved their literacy scores considerably more than the treatment group, with a standardised improvement of +0.99 compared to +0.56 (overall “effect” size of −0.37), suggesting that the software approach yields no relative advantage for improvements, and may even disadvantage some pupils. On this evidence, the use of software, of a kind that is in very common use across schools in England, was a waste of resource. This could be an important corrective finding for an area of schooling that has been the focus of intense policy and practice attention. Of course, the software used has now been superseded by the same and different publishers. But the paper discusses the implications of these results for the use of such software to teach literacy more widely, for the way in which publisher claims are worded, and for the research community in relation to the feasibility of conducting pragmatic trials in school settings. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Copyright of Educational Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 70209235
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A randomised controlled trial of the use of a piece of commercial software for the acquisition of reading skills.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Khan%2C+MuhammadAhmad%22">Khan, MuhammadAhmad</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gorard%2C+Stephen%22">Gorard, Stephen</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Educational+Review%22">Educational Review</searchLink>. Feb2012, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p21-35. 15p. 4 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+assisted+instruction+software%22">Computer assisted instruction software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+ability+testing+in+secondary+schools%22">Reading ability testing in secondary schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classroom+activities%22">Classroom activities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Randomized+controlled+trials%22">Randomized controlled trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Schools%22">Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education+policy%22">Education policy</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Northern+England%22">Northern England</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22England%22">England</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: We report here the overall results of a cluster randomised controlled trial of the use of computer-aided instruction with 672 Year 7 pupils in 23 secondary school classes in the north of England. A new piece of commercial software, claimed on the basis of publisher testing to be effective in improving reading after just six weeks of use in the classroom, was compared over 10 weeks (one term) with standard practice in literacy provision. Pupil literacy was assessed before and after the trial, via another piece of commercial software testing precisely the kinds of skills covered by the pedagogical software. Both the treatment group and the comparison group improved their tested literacy. In a sense the publisher’s claim was justified. However, the comparison group improved their literacy scores considerably more than the treatment group, with a standardised improvement of +0.99 compared to +0.56 (overall “effect” size of −0.37), suggesting that the software approach yields no relative advantage for improvements, and may even disadvantage some pupils. On this evidence, the use of software, of a kind that is in very common use across schools in England, was a waste of resource. This could be an important corrective finding for an area of schooling that has been the focus of intense policy and practice attention. Of course, the software used has now been superseded by the same and different publishers. But the paper discusses the implications of these results for the use of such software to teach literacy more widely, for the way in which publisher claims are worded, and for the research community in relation to the feasibility of conducting pragmatic trials in school settings. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Educational Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=70209235
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/00131911.2010.537315
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 21
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Computer assisted instruction software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reading ability testing in secondary schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Classroom activities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Randomized controlled trials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Education policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Northern England
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: England
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A randomised controlled trial of the use of a piece of commercial software for the acquisition of reading skills.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Khan, MuhammadAhmad
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gorard, Stephen
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Text: Feb2012
              Type: published
              Y: 2012
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00131911
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 64
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Educational Review
              Type: main
ResultId 1