View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

SUBSTANCE USE IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: A COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT METHODS.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: SUBSTANCE USE IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: A COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT METHODS.
Authors: Hersch, Rebekah K. (AUTHOR), McPherson, Tracy L. (AUTHOR), Cook, Royer F. (AUTHOR)
Source: Substance Use & Misuse. Sep2002, Vol. 37 Issue 11, p1331-1358. 28p. 8 Charts.
Subjects: Substance abuse, Construction workers, People with alcoholism, Construction industry, Health
Abstract (English): Most users of illicit drugs are employed adults, with substance use rates especially high in the construction industry. In an effort to shed light on the nature and extent of drug use among construction industry workers, and to compare drug use assessment methods, substance use among construction workers, 60% of whom were apprentices, across six sites was assessed by questionnaire, urinalysis, and hair analysis. Nearly 17% of the participants reported current drug use, although drug use differed dramatically by site. Drug use rates also differed by respondent characteristics, participation rates, and assessment method. The strengths and weaknesses of each assessment method are discussed, along with the rationale for combining methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): La mayoría de los usuarios de drogas ilícitas son adultos empleados; los índices de utilización de sustancias son especialmente altos en el sector de la construcción. A los efectos de arrojar luz sobre las características y el nivel de uso de drogas entre los trabajadores de ese sector se evaluó el uso de sustancias sicotrópicas entre los trabajadores de la construcción, 60% de los cuales eran aprendices, de seis sitios mediante un cuestionario, análisis de orina y análisis del cabello. Casi el 17% de los participantes declararon uso de drogas en el momento del estudio, aunque el uso de drogas variaba notablemente de un sitio a otro. Los índices de uso de drogas variaban también en función de las características del respondiente, los índices de participación y el método de evaluación. Se examinan las virtudes y defectos de cada uno de los métodos de evaluación utilizados, junto con el fundamento de los métodos de combinación de los mismos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (French): La plupart des toxicomanes sont des travailleurs adultes, les taux de toxicomanie étant particulièrement élevés dans l'industrie du bâtiment. Afin de faire la lumière sur la nature et l'importance de la toxicomanie parmi les ouvriers du bâtiment, et de comparer les méthodes d'évaluation de la toxicomanie, l'on a évalué la consommation de substances toxiques parmi des ouvriers du bâtiment (dont 60% étaient des apprentis) travaillant sur six chantiers, et ce au moyen de questionnaires, d'analyses d'urine et d'analyses capillaire. Presque 17% des participants ont fait état d'une consommation actuelle de drogue, quoique cette consommation variait considérablement d'un chantier à l'autre. Les taux de toxicomanie variaient également selon les caractéristiques des répondants, les taux de participation et la méthode d'évaluation. Les forces et les faiblesses de chaque méthode d'évaluation sont discutées, ainsi que les raisons justifiant de combiner ces méthodes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Substance Use & Misuse is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 7416326
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: SUBSTANCE USE IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: A COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT METHODS.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hersch%2C+Rebekah+K%2E%22">Hersch, Rebekah K.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McPherson%2C+Tracy+L%2E%22">McPherson, Tracy L.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cook%2C+Royer+F%2E%22">Cook, Royer F.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Substance+Use+%26+Misuse%22">Substance Use & Misuse</searchLink>. Sep2002, Vol. 37 Issue 11, p1331-1358. 28p. 8 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Substance+abuse%22">Substance abuse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Construction+workers%22">Construction workers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22People+with+alcoholism%22">People with alcoholism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Construction+industry%22">Construction industry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health%22">Health</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (English)
  Group: Ab
  Data: Most users of illicit drugs are employed adults, with substance use rates especially high in the construction industry. In an effort to shed light on the nature and extent of drug use among construction industry workers, and to compare drug use assessment methods, substance use among construction workers, 60% of whom were apprentices, across six sites was assessed by questionnaire, urinalysis, and hair analysis. Nearly 17% of the participants reported current drug use, although drug use differed dramatically by site. Drug use rates also differed by respondent characteristics, participation rates, and assessment method. The strengths and weaknesses of each assessment method are discussed, along with the rationale for combining methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (Spanish)
  Group: Ab
  Data: La mayoría de los usuarios de drogas ilícitas son adultos empleados; los índices de utilización de sustancias son especialmente altos en el sector de la construcción. A los efectos de arrojar luz sobre las características y el nivel de uso de drogas entre los trabajadores de ese sector se evaluó el uso de sustancias sicotrópicas entre los trabajadores de la construcción, 60% de los cuales eran aprendices, de seis sitios mediante un cuestionario, análisis de orina y análisis del cabello. Casi el 17% de los participantes declararon uso de drogas en el momento del estudio, aunque el uso de drogas variaba notablemente de un sitio a otro. Los índices de uso de drogas variaban también en función de las características del respondiente, los índices de participación y el método de evaluación. Se examinan las virtudes y defectos de cada uno de los métodos de evaluación utilizados, junto con el fundamento de los métodos de combinación de los mismos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (French)
  Group: Ab
  Data: La plupart des toxicomanes sont des travailleurs adultes, les taux de toxicomanie étant particulièrement élevés dans l'industrie du bâtiment. Afin de faire la lumière sur la nature et l'importance de la toxicomanie parmi les ouvriers du bâtiment, et de comparer les méthodes d'évaluation de la toxicomanie, l'on a évalué la consommation de substances toxiques parmi des ouvriers du bâtiment (dont 60% étaient des apprentis) travaillant sur six chantiers, et ce au moyen de questionnaires, d'analyses d'urine et d'analyses capillaire. Presque 17% des participants ont fait état d'une consommation actuelle de drogue, quoique cette consommation variait considérablement d'un chantier à l'autre. Les taux de toxicomanie variaient également selon les caractéristiques des répondants, les taux de participation et la méthode d'évaluation. Les forces et les faiblesses de chaque méthode d'évaluation sont discutées, ainsi que les raisons justifiant de combiner ces méthodes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Substance Use & Misuse is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=7416326
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1081/JA-120014081
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 28
        StartPage: 1331
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Substance abuse
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Construction workers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: People with alcoholism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Construction industry
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: SUBSTANCE USE IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: A COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT METHODS.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hersch, Rebekah K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: McPherson, Tracy L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cook, Royer F.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2002
              Type: published
              Y: 2002
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10826084
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 37
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Substance Use & Misuse
              Type: main
ResultId 1