View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

The Unbearable Vagueness of “Essence”: Forty-Four Clarification Questions for Gray, Young, and Waytz.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Unbearable Vagueness of “Essence”: Forty-Four Clarification Questions for Gray, Young, and Waytz.
Authors: Graham, Jesse (AUTHOR), Iyer, Ravi (AUTHOR)
Source: Psychological Inquiry. 2012, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p162-165. 4p.
Subjects: Ethics, Sensory perception, Dyadic analysis (Social sciences), Agent (Philosophy), Suffering
Abstract: The authors reflect on the arguments of Gray, Young and Waytz regarding the essence of morality. They note that the authors have showed evidence on the association of mind perception and morality and claimed that mind perception is the essence of morality but provide no specific evidence to prove their theory. They argue that the authors have introduced more uncertainty about their argument on the dyadic combination of intentionally harmful agent and suffering patient in moral judgments.
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 76274178
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Unbearable Vagueness of “Essence”: Forty-Four Clarification Questions for Gray, Young, and Waytz.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Graham%2C+Jesse%22">Graham, Jesse</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Iyer%2C+Ravi%22">Iyer, Ravi</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychological+Inquiry%22">Psychological Inquiry</searchLink>. 2012, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p162-165. 4p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sensory+perception%22">Sensory perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dyadic+analysis+%28Social+sciences%29%22">Dyadic analysis (Social sciences)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Agent+%28Philosophy%29%22">Agent (Philosophy)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Suffering%22">Suffering</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The authors reflect on the arguments of Gray, Young and Waytz regarding the essence of morality. They note that the authors have showed evidence on the association of mind perception and morality and claimed that mind perception is the essence of morality but provide no specific evidence to prove their theory. They argue that the authors have introduced more uncertainty about their argument on the dyadic combination of intentionally harmful agent and suffering patient in moral judgments.
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=76274178
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.667767
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 4
        StartPage: 162
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sensory perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dyadic analysis (Social sciences)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Agent (Philosophy)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Suffering
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Unbearable Vagueness of “Essence”: Forty-Four Clarification Questions for Gray, Young, and Waytz.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Graham, Jesse
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Iyer, Ravi
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Text: 2012
              Type: published
              Y: 2012
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1047840X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 23
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychological Inquiry
              Type: main
ResultId 1