The reliability of sensitive information provided by injecting drug users in a clinical setting: Clinician-administered versus audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI).
Saved in:
| Title: | The reliability of sensitive information provided by injecting drug users in a clinical setting: Clinician-administered versus audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI). |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Islam, M. Mofizul (AUTHOR), Topp, Libby (AUTHOR), Conigrave, KatherineM. (AUTHOR), van Beek, Ingrid (AUTHOR), Maher, Lisa (AUTHOR), White, Ann (AUTHOR), Rodgers, Craig (AUTHOR), Day, CarolynA. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | AIDS Care. Dec2012, Vol. 24 Issue 12, p1496-1503. 8p. 3 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Automatic data collection systems, Intravenous drug abuse, Confidence intervals, Statistical correlation, Epidemiology, Interviewing, Sex work, Research evaluation, Risk-taking behavior, Scales (Weighing instruments), Self-evaluation, Sound recordings, Statistics, Logistic regression analysis, Data analysis, Labeling theory, Inter-observer reliability, Content mining, Data analysis software, Descriptive statistics |
| Geographic Terms: | Australia |
| Abstract: | Research with injecting drug users (IDUs) suggests greater willingness to report sensitive and stigmatised behaviour via audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) methods than during face-to-face interviews (FFIs); however, previous studies were limited in verifying this within the same individuals at the same time point. This study examines the relative willingness of IDUs to report sensitive information via ACASI and during a face-to-face clinical assessment administered in health services for IDUs. During recruitment for a randomised controlled trial undertaken at two IDU-targeted health services, assessments were undertaken as per clinical protocols, followed by referral of eligible clients to the trial, in which baseline self-report data were collected via ACASI. Five questions about sensitive injecting and sexual risk behaviours were administered to participants during both clinical interviews and baseline research data collection. “Percentage agreement” determined the magnitude of concordance/discordance in responses across interview methods, while tests appropriate to data format assessed the statistical significance of this variation. Results for all five variables suggest that, relative to ACASI, FFI elicited responses that may be perceived as more socially desirable. Discordance was statistically significant for four of the five variables examined. Participants who reported a history of sex work were more likely to provide discordant responses to at least one socially sensitive item. In health services for IDUs, information collection via ACASI may elicit more reliable and valid responses than FFI. Adoption of a universal precautionary approach to complement individually tailored assessment of and advice regarding health risk behaviours for IDUs may address this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
| Copyright of AIDS Care is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 82935588 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The reliability of sensitive information provided by injecting drug users in a clinical setting: Clinician-administered versus audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI). – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Islam%2C+M%2E+Mofizul%22">Islam, M. Mofizul</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Topp%2C+Libby%22">Topp, Libby</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Conigrave%2C+KatherineM%2E%22">Conigrave, KatherineM.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+Beek%2C+Ingrid%22">van Beek, Ingrid</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Maher%2C+Lisa%22">Maher, Lisa</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22White%2C+Ann%22">White, Ann</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rodgers%2C+Craig%22">Rodgers, Craig</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Day%2C+CarolynA%2E%22">Day, CarolynA.</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22AIDS+Care%22">AIDS Care</searchLink>. Dec2012, Vol. 24 Issue 12, p1496-1503. 8p. 3 Charts. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Automatic+data+collection+systems%22">Automatic data collection systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intravenous+drug+abuse%22">Intravenous drug abuse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+correlation%22">Statistical correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Epidemiology%22">Epidemiology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+work%22">Sex work</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Risk-taking+behavior%22">Risk-taking behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scales+%28Weighing+instruments%29%22">Scales (Weighing instruments)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-evaluation%22">Self-evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sound+recordings%22">Sound recordings</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Logistic+regression+analysis%22">Logistic regression analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Labeling+theory%22">Labeling theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inter-observer+reliability%22">Inter-observer reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Content+mining%22">Content mining</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Research with injecting drug users (IDUs) suggests greater willingness to report sensitive and stigmatised behaviour via audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) methods than during face-to-face interviews (FFIs); however, previous studies were limited in verifying this within the same individuals at the same time point. This study examines the relative willingness of IDUs to report sensitive information via ACASI and during a face-to-face clinical assessment administered in health services for IDUs. During recruitment for a randomised controlled trial undertaken at two IDU-targeted health services, assessments were undertaken as per clinical protocols, followed by referral of eligible clients to the trial, in which baseline self-report data were collected via ACASI. Five questions about sensitive injecting and sexual risk behaviours were administered to participants during both clinical interviews and baseline research data collection. “Percentage agreement” determined the magnitude of concordance/discordance in responses across interview methods, while tests appropriate to data format assessed the statistical significance of this variation. Results for all five variables suggest that, relative to ACASI, FFI elicited responses that may be perceived as more socially desirable. Discordance was statistically significant for four of the five variables examined. Participants who reported a history of sex work were more likely to provide discordant responses to at least one socially sensitive item. In health services for IDUs, information collection via ACASI may elicit more reliable and valid responses than FFI. Adoption of a universal precautionary approach to complement individually tailored assessment of and advice regarding health risk behaviours for IDUs may address this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of AIDS Care is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=82935588 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/09540121.2012.663886 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 StartPage: 1496 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Automatic data collection systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Intravenous drug abuse Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical correlation Type: general – SubjectFull: Epidemiology Type: general – SubjectFull: Interviewing Type: general – SubjectFull: Sex work Type: general – SubjectFull: Research evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Risk-taking behavior Type: general – SubjectFull: Scales (Weighing instruments) Type: general – SubjectFull: Self-evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Sound recordings Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Logistic regression analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Labeling theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Inter-observer reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Content mining Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Australia Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The reliability of sensitive information provided by injecting drug users in a clinical setting: Clinician-administered versus audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI). Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Islam, M. Mofizul – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Topp, Libby – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Conigrave, KatherineM. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: van Beek, Ingrid – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Maher, Lisa – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: White, Ann – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rodgers, Craig – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Day, CarolynA. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Text: Dec2012 Type: published Y: 2012 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09540121 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 24 – Type: issue Value: 12 Titles: – TitleFull: AIDS Care Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |