View in EDS PDF Full Text

Subjective criteria and illusions in visual testing: some methodological limitations.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Subjective criteria and illusions in visual testing: some methodological limitations.
Authors: Skottun, Bernt, Skoyles, John
Source: Psychological Research. Jan2014, Vol. 78 Issue 1, p136-140. 5p.
Subjects: Visual perception testing, Methodology, Comparative studies, People with dyslexia, Readers, Data analysis
Abstract: It is argued that illusions cannot generally be investigated with criterion-independent methods. This limits the value of the data obtained from them. This is particularly important when the results are compared between groups of subjects, for example, between dyslexic readers and controls, since it is possible that the differences between the groups reflect differences with regard to criteria rather than real perceptual differences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychological Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 93435248
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Subjective criteria and illusions in visual testing: some methodological limitations.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Skottun%2C+Bernt%22">Skottun, Bernt</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Skoyles%2C+John%22">Skoyles, John</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Psychological+Research%22">Psychological Research</searchLink>. Jan2014, Vol. 78 Issue 1, p136-140. 5p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+perception+testing%22">Visual perception testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Methodology%22">Methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22People+with+dyslexia%22">People with dyslexia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Readers%22">Readers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: It is argued that illusions cannot generally be investigated with criterion-independent methods. This limits the value of the data obtained from them. This is particularly important when the results are compared between groups of subjects, for example, between dyslexic readers and controls, since it is possible that the differences between the groups reflect differences with regard to criteria rather than real perceptual differences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Psychological Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=93435248
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00426-013-0482-z
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 5
        StartPage: 136
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Visual perception testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: People with dyslexia
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Readers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Subjective criteria and illusions in visual testing: some methodological limitations.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Skottun, Bernt
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Skoyles, John
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan2014
              Type: published
              Y: 2014
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03400727
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 78
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychological Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1