View in EDS PDF Full Text

Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).
Authors: Hay, Jennifer, Atkinson, Thomas, Reeve, Bryce, Mitchell, Sandra, Mendoza, Tito, Willis, Gordon, Minasian, Lori, Clauser, Steven, Denicoff, Andrea, O'Mara, Ann, Chen, Alice, Bennett, Antonia, Paul, Diane, Gagne, Joshua, Rogak, Lauren, Sit, Laura, Viswanath, Vish, Schrag, Deborah, Basch, Ethan
Source: Quality of Life Research. Feb2014, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p257-269. 13p. 1 Diagram, 5 Charts.
Subjects: National Cancer Institute (U.S.), Cognitive ability, Cancer chemotherapy, Clinical trials, Patient compliance, Psychometrics, Drug toxicity
Abstract: Purpose: The National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) is a library of question items that enables patient reporting of adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials. This study contributes content validity evidence of the PRO-CTCAE by incorporating cancer patient input of the relevance and comprehensiveness of the item library. Methods: Cognitive interviews were conducted among patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy at multiple sites to evaluate comprehension, memory retrieval, judgment, and response mapping related to AE terms (e.g., nausea), attribute terms (regarding frequency, severity, or interference), response options, and recall period. Three interview rounds were conducted with ≥20 patients completing each item per round. Items were modified and retested if ≥3 patients exhibited cognitive difficulties or if experienced by ≤25 % patients. Results: One hundred and twenty-seven patients participated (35 % ≤high school, 28 % non-white, and 59 % female). Most AE terms (63/80) generated no cognitive difficulties. The remaining 17 were modified without further difficulties by Round 3. Terms were comprehended regardless of education level. Attribute terms and response options required no modifications. Patient adherence to recall period (7 days) was improved when the reference period was incorporated. Conclusions: This study provides evidence confirming comprehension of the US English language versions of items in the PRO-CTCAE library for measuring symptomatic AEs from the patient perspective within the context of cancer treatment. Several minor changes were made to the items to improve item clarity, comprehension, and ease of response judgment. This study helps to establish the content validity of PRO-CTCAE items for patient reporting of AEs during cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 93922460
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hay%2C+Jennifer%22">Hay, Jennifer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Atkinson%2C+Thomas%22">Atkinson, Thomas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Reeve%2C+Bryce%22">Reeve, Bryce</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mitchell%2C+Sandra%22">Mitchell, Sandra</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mendoza%2C+Tito%22">Mendoza, Tito</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Willis%2C+Gordon%22">Willis, Gordon</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Minasian%2C+Lori%22">Minasian, Lori</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Clauser%2C+Steven%22">Clauser, Steven</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Denicoff%2C+Andrea%22">Denicoff, Andrea</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22O'Mara%2C+Ann%22">O'Mara, Ann</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Alice%22">Chen, Alice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bennett%2C+Antonia%22">Bennett, Antonia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Paul%2C+Diane%22">Paul, Diane</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gagne%2C+Joshua%22">Gagne, Joshua</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rogak%2C+Lauren%22">Rogak, Lauren</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sit%2C+Laura%22">Sit, Laura</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Viswanath%2C+Vish%22">Viswanath, Vish</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schrag%2C+Deborah%22">Schrag, Deborah</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Basch%2C+Ethan%22">Basch, Ethan</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Quality+of+Life+Research%22">Quality of Life Research</searchLink>. Feb2014, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p257-269. 13p. 1 Diagram, 5 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22National+Cancer+Institute+%28U%2ES%2E%29%22">National Cancer Institute (U.S.)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+ability%22">Cognitive ability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cancer+chemotherapy%22">Cancer chemotherapy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+trials%22">Clinical trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patient+compliance%22">Patient compliance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychometrics%22">Psychometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Drug+toxicity%22">Drug toxicity</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: The National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) is a library of question items that enables patient reporting of adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials. This study contributes content validity evidence of the PRO-CTCAE by incorporating cancer patient input of the relevance and comprehensiveness of the item library. Methods: Cognitive interviews were conducted among patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy at multiple sites to evaluate comprehension, memory retrieval, judgment, and response mapping related to AE terms (e.g., nausea), attribute terms (regarding frequency, severity, or interference), response options, and recall period. Three interview rounds were conducted with ≥20 patients completing each item per round. Items were modified and retested if ≥3 patients exhibited cognitive difficulties or if experienced by ≤25 % patients. Results: One hundred and twenty-seven patients participated (35 % ≤high school, 28 % non-white, and 59 % female). Most AE terms (63/80) generated no cognitive difficulties. The remaining 17 were modified without further difficulties by Round 3. Terms were comprehended regardless of education level. Attribute terms and response options required no modifications. Patient adherence to recall period (7 days) was improved when the reference period was incorporated. Conclusions: This study provides evidence confirming comprehension of the US English language versions of items in the PRO-CTCAE library for measuring symptomatic AEs from the patient perspective within the context of cancer treatment. Several minor changes were made to the items to improve item clarity, comprehension, and ease of response judgment. This study helps to establish the content validity of PRO-CTCAE items for patient reporting of AEs during cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=93922460
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11136-013-0470-1
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 13
        StartPage: 257
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive ability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cancer chemotherapy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Clinical trials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Patient compliance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychometrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Drug toxicity
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hay, Jennifer
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Atkinson, Thomas
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Reeve, Bryce
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mitchell, Sandra
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mendoza, Tito
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Willis, Gordon
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Minasian, Lori
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Clauser, Steven
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Denicoff, Andrea
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: O'Mara, Ann
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chen, Alice
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bennett, Antonia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Paul, Diane
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gagne, Joshua
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rogak, Lauren
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sit, Laura
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Viswanath, Vish
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Schrag, Deborah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Basch, Ethan
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Text: Feb2014
              Type: published
              Y: 2014
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09629343
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 23
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Quality of Life Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1