Evaluating Adolescent Units: Some considerations for research and clinical practice.
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluating Adolescent Units: Some considerations for research and clinical practice. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Swales, Michaela A, Kiehn, Barry |
| Source: | Journal of Mental Health. Jul95, Vol. 4 Issue 3, p227-241. 15p. 1 Chart. |
| Subjects: | Residential treatment of adolescents |
| Abstract: | Recent reviews of the effectiveness of residential treatment for adolescents have attempted to identify predictors of outcome in the residential setting. In general, variables which predict outcome relate to the pathology of the adolescent, factors relating to their family and aspects of the treatment itself. However, it has not proved possible to identify a consistent set of predictors of outcome across residential settings or treatment programmes. The heterogeneity of the outcome data has been attributed to serious methodological flaws present in much of the recent research. Strategies used in conventional psychotherapy outcome trials to overcome methodological weaknesses have been suggested as remedies to improve the quality of the outcome data. This paper discusses why such strategies may be difficult to implement in residential settings. Alternative designs, which are theoretically motivated, are then considered. These designs may assist in overcoming some of the problems in conducting good quality research in residential settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Mental Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 9508213434 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Evaluating Adolescent Units: Some considerations for research and clinical practice. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Swales%2C+Michaela+A%22">Swales, Michaela A</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kiehn%2C+Barry%22">Kiehn, Barry</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Mental+Health%22">Journal of Mental Health</searchLink>. Jul95, Vol. 4 Issue 3, p227-241. 15p. 1 Chart. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Residential+treatment+of+adolescents%22">Residential treatment of adolescents</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Recent reviews of the effectiveness of residential treatment for adolescents have attempted to identify predictors of outcome in the residential setting. In general, variables which predict outcome relate to the pathology of the adolescent, factors relating to their family and aspects of the treatment itself. However, it has not proved possible to identify a consistent set of predictors of outcome across residential settings or treatment programmes. The heterogeneity of the outcome data has been attributed to serious methodological flaws present in much of the recent research. Strategies used in conventional psychotherapy outcome trials to overcome methodological weaknesses have been suggested as remedies to improve the quality of the outcome data. This paper discusses why such strategies may be difficult to implement in residential settings. Alternative designs, which are theoretically motivated, are then considered. These designs may assist in overcoming some of the problems in conducting good quality research in residential settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Mental Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=9508213434 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/09638239550037505 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 227 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Residential treatment of adolescents Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Evaluating Adolescent Units: Some considerations for research and clinical practice. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Swales, Michaela A – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kiehn, Barry IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Text: Jul95 Type: published Y: 1995 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09638237 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 4 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Mental Health Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
