View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Moral rationality and intuition: An exploration of relationships between the Defining Issues Test and the Moral Foundations Questionnaire.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Moral rationality and intuition: An exploration of relationships between the Defining Issues Test and the Moral Foundations Questionnaire.
Authors: Glover, Rebecca J. (AUTHOR), Natesan, Prathiba (AUTHOR), Wang, Jie (AUTHOR), Rohr, Danielle (AUTHOR), McAfee-Etheridge, Lauri (AUTHOR), Booker, Dana D. (AUTHOR), Bishop, James (AUTHOR), Lee, David (AUTHOR), Kildare, Cory (AUTHOR), Wu, Minwei (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Moral Education. Dec2014, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p395-412. 18p. 4 Diagrams, 5 Charts.
Subjects: Moral reasoning, Intuition, Defining Issues Test, Moral development, Questionnaires, Ethics
Abstract: Explorations of relationships between Haidt’s Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) and indices of moral decision-making assessed by the Defining Issues Test have been limited to correlational analyses. This study used Harm, Fairness, Ingroup, Authority and Purity to predict overall moral judgment and individual Defining Issues Test-2 (DIT-2) schema scores using responses from 222 undergraduates. Relationships were not confirmed between the separate foundations and the DIT-2 indices. Using the MFQ moral judgment items only, confirmatory factor analyses confirmed higher order constructs called Individualizing and Binding foundations. Structural models using these higher order factors fitted the data well, and findings indicated that the Binding foundations significantly positively predicted Maintaining Norms and negatively predicted both overall moral judgment (N2) and the Postconventional Schema. Neither Individualizing nor Binding foundations significantly predicted Personal Interest. While moral judgments assessed by DIT-2 may not be evoking the MFQ foundations, findings here suggest the MFQ may not be a suitable measure for capturing more advanced moral functioning. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Copyright of Journal of Moral Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 99043216
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Moral rationality and intuition: An exploration of relationships between the Defining Issues Test and the Moral Foundations Questionnaire.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Glover%2C+Rebecca+J%2E%22">Glover, Rebecca J.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Natesan%2C+Prathiba%22">Natesan, Prathiba</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Jie%22">Wang, Jie</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rohr%2C+Danielle%22">Rohr, Danielle</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McAfee-Etheridge%2C+Lauri%22">McAfee-Etheridge, Lauri</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Booker%2C+Dana+D%2E%22">Booker, Dana D.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bishop%2C+James%22">Bishop, James</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lee%2C+David%22">Lee, David</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kildare%2C+Cory%22">Kildare, Cory</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wu%2C+Minwei%22">Wu, Minwei</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Moral+Education%22">Journal of Moral Education</searchLink>. Dec2014, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p395-412. 18p. 4 Diagrams, 5 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moral+reasoning%22">Moral reasoning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intuition%22">Intuition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Defining+Issues+Test%22">Defining Issues Test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moral+development%22">Moral development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Explorations of relationships between Haidt’s Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) and indices of moral decision-making assessed by the Defining Issues Test have been limited to correlational analyses. This study used Harm, Fairness, Ingroup, Authority and Purity to predict overall moral judgment and individual Defining Issues Test-2 (DIT-2) schema scores using responses from 222 undergraduates. Relationships were not confirmed between the separate foundations and the DIT-2 indices. Using the MFQ moral judgment items only, confirmatory factor analyses confirmed higher order constructs called Individualizing and Binding foundations. Structural models using these higher order factors fitted the data well, and findings indicated that the Binding foundations significantly positively predicted Maintaining Norms and negatively predicted both overall moral judgment (N2) and the Postconventional Schema. Neither Individualizing nor Binding foundations significantly predicted Personal Interest. While moral judgments assessed by DIT-2 may not be evoking the MFQ foundations, findings here suggest the MFQ may not be a suitable measure for capturing more advanced moral functioning. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Moral Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=99043216
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/03057240.2014.953043
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 18
        StartPage: 395
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Moral reasoning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intuition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Defining Issues Test
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Moral development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Questionnaires
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethics
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Moral rationality and intuition: An exploration of relationships between the Defining Issues Test and the Moral Foundations Questionnaire.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Glover, Rebecca J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Natesan, Prathiba
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wang, Jie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rohr, Danielle
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: McAfee-Etheridge, Lauri
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Booker, Dana D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bishop, James
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lee, David
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kildare, Cory
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wu, Minwei
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2014
              Type: published
              Y: 2014
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03057240
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 43
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Moral Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1