The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity.
Authors: Monticone, Marco, Ferrante, Simona, Ferrari, Silvano, Foti, Calogero, Mugnai, Raffaele, Pillastrini, Paolo, Rocca, Barbara, Vanti, Carla
Source: Quality of Life Research. Aug2014, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p1789-1795. 7p.
Subjects: Pain perception, Psychometrics, Backache, Factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, Questionnaires
Abstract: Purpose: To create an Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory (PBAPI-I) and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods: The PBAPI was culturally adapted in accordance with international standards. The psychometric testing included factor analysis, investigating reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test/retest stability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC), and exploring construct validity by comparing the PBAPI-I with a pain numerical rating scale (NRS), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) and the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (Pearson's correlation). Results: One hundred and sixty-seven subjects with chronic low back pain (83 % compliance) completed the tool. Factor analysis revealed a three-factor (Time, Mystery and Self-Blame), 16-item solution (explained variance: 80 %). The questionnaire was internally consistent ( α = 0.91-0.96), and its stability was good (ICCs = 0.73-0.82). As expected, the construct validity estimates indicated that the Time and Mystery subscales moderately correlated with the NRS ( r = 0.33-0.54), RMDQ ( r = 0.34-0.47), PCS ( r = 0.37-0.49) and TSK ( r = 0.30-0.43), whereas the correlations between the Self-Blame subscale and the same measures were poorer. The correlations with the HADS were moderate and poor (anxiety: r = 0.37-0.05; depression: r = 0.39-0.07). Maladaptive coping strategies were more related to pain beliefs than adaptive strategies. Conclusion: The PBAPI-I has good psychometric properties that replicate those of other versions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 99370796
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Monticone%2C+Marco%22">Monticone, Marco</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ferrante%2C+Simona%22">Ferrante, Simona</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ferrari%2C+Silvano%22">Ferrari, Silvano</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Foti%2C+Calogero%22">Foti, Calogero</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mugnai%2C+Raffaele%22">Mugnai, Raffaele</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pillastrini%2C+Paolo%22">Pillastrini, Paolo</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rocca%2C+Barbara%22">Rocca, Barbara</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vanti%2C+Carla%22">Vanti, Carla</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Quality+of+Life+Research%22">Quality of Life Research</searchLink>. Aug2014, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p1789-1795. 7p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pain+perception%22">Pain perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychometrics%22">Psychometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Backache%22">Backache</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factor+analysis%22">Factor analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cronbach's+alpha%22">Cronbach's alpha</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: To create an Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory (PBAPI-I) and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods: The PBAPI was culturally adapted in accordance with international standards. The psychometric testing included factor analysis, investigating reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test/retest stability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC), and exploring construct validity by comparing the PBAPI-I with a pain numerical rating scale (NRS), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) and the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (Pearson's correlation). Results: One hundred and sixty-seven subjects with chronic low back pain (83 % compliance) completed the tool. Factor analysis revealed a three-factor (Time, Mystery and Self-Blame), 16-item solution (explained variance: 80 %). The questionnaire was internally consistent ( α = 0.91-0.96), and its stability was good (ICCs = 0.73-0.82). As expected, the construct validity estimates indicated that the Time and Mystery subscales moderately correlated with the NRS ( r = 0.33-0.54), RMDQ ( r = 0.34-0.47), PCS ( r = 0.37-0.49) and TSK ( r = 0.30-0.43), whereas the correlations between the Self-Blame subscale and the same measures were poorer. The correlations with the HADS were moderate and poor (anxiety: r = 0.37-0.05; depression: r = 0.39-0.07). Maladaptive coping strategies were more related to pain beliefs than adaptive strategies. Conclusion: The PBAPI-I has good psychometric properties that replicate those of other versions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Quality of Life Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=99370796
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11136-013-0621-4
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 1789
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Pain perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychometrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Backache
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Factor analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cronbach's alpha
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Questionnaires
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Monticone, Marco
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ferrante, Simona
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ferrari, Silvano
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Foti, Calogero
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mugnai, Raffaele
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pillastrini, Paolo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rocca, Barbara
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vanti, Carla
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2014
              Type: published
              Y: 2014
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09629343
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 23
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Quality of Life Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1