APA (7th ed.) Citation

Pearson, L. T., Fox, K. T., Keenan, A., Behm, D. G., Stuart, S., Goodall, S., & Barry, G. (2024). Comparison of low-dose maximal-intent versus controlled-tempo resistance training on quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength in untrained healthy adults: A comparative effectiveness study. BMC Sports Science, Medicine & Rehabilitation, 16(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00847-z

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Pearson, Liam T., Kai T. Fox, Ashleigh Keenan, David G. Behm, Sam Stuart, Stuart Goodall, and Gill Barry. "Comparison of Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life, Functional Capacity, and Strength in Untrained Healthy Adults: A Comparative Effectiveness Study." BMC Sports Science, Medicine & Rehabilitation 16, no. 1 (2024): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00847-z.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Pearson, Liam T., et al. "Comparison of Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life, Functional Capacity, and Strength in Untrained Healthy Adults: A Comparative Effectiveness Study." BMC Sports Science, Medicine & Rehabilitation, vol. 16, no. 1, 2024, p. 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00847-z.