International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes.
Saved in:
| Title: | International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Rogers, Gary D. (AUTHOR), Thistlethwaite, Jill E. (AUTHOR), Anderson, Elizabeth S. (AUTHOR), Abrandt Dahlgren, Madeleine (AUTHOR), Grymonpre, Ruby E. (AUTHOR), Moran, Monica (AUTHOR), Samarasekera, Dujeepa D. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Medical Teacher. Apr2017, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p347-359. 13p. |
| Subjects: | Interprofessional education, Educational outcomes, Learning, Teaching methods, Consensus (Social sciences), Professional education, Allied health personnel, Debate, Discussion, Curriculum, Interdisciplinary education, Interprofessional relations, Reflection (Philosophy), Students, Rating of students, Teams in the workplace, Adult education workshops, World Wide Web, Writing, Information resources, Professional practice, Health occupations school faculty, Teacher development |
| Geographic Terms: | Australia, United Kingdom, North America |
| Abstract: | Regulatory frameworks around the world mandate that health and social care professional education programs graduate practitioners who have the competence and capability to practice effectively in interprofessional collaborative teams. Academic institutions are responding by offering interprofessional education (IPE); however, there is as yet no consensus regarding optimal strategies for the assessment of interprofessional learning (IPL). The Program Committee for the 17th Ottawa Conference in Perth, Australia in March, 2016, invited IPE champions to debate and discuss the current status of the assessment of IPL. A draft statement from this workshop was further discussed at the global All Together Better Health VIII conference in Oxford, UK in September, 2016. The outcomes of these deliberations and a final round of electronic consultation informed the work of a core group of international IPE leaders to develop this document. The consensus statement we present here is the result of the synthesized views of experts and global colleagues. It outlines the challenges and difficulties but endorses a set of desired learning outcome categories and methods of assessment that can be adapted to individual contexts and resources. The points of consensus focus on pre-qualification (pre-licensure) health professional students but may be transferable into post-qualification arenas. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
| Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Teacher Reference Center |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: trh DbLabel: Teacher Reference Center An: 122343201 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rogers%2C+Gary+D%2E%22">Rogers, Gary D.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thistlethwaite%2C+Jill+E%2E%22">Thistlethwaite, Jill E.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anderson%2C+Elizabeth+S%2E%22">Anderson, Elizabeth S.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Abrandt+Dahlgren%2C+Madeleine%22">Abrandt Dahlgren, Madeleine</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grymonpre%2C+Ruby+E%2E%22">Grymonpre, Ruby E.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moran%2C+Monica%22">Moran, Monica</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Samarasekera%2C+Dujeepa+D%2E%22">Samarasekera, Dujeepa D.</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Teacher%22">Medical Teacher</searchLink>. Apr2017, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p347-359. 13p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interprofessional+education%22">Interprofessional education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+outcomes%22">Educational outcomes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning%22">Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+methods%22">Teaching methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Consensus+%28Social+sciences%29%22">Consensus (Social sciences)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+education%22">Professional education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Allied+health+personnel%22">Allied health personnel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Debate%22">Debate</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discussion%22">Discussion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum%22">Curriculum</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interdisciplinary+education%22">Interdisciplinary education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interprofessional+relations%22">Interprofessional relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reflection+%28Philosophy%29%22">Reflection (Philosophy)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Students%22">Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rating+of+students%22">Rating of students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teams+in+the+workplace%22">Teams in the workplace</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adult+education+workshops%22">Adult education workshops</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22World+Wide+Web%22">World Wide Web</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing%22">Writing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+resources%22">Information resources</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+practice%22">Professional practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+occupations+school+faculty%22">Health occupations school faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+development%22">Teacher development</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22North+America%22">North America</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Regulatory frameworks around the world mandate that health and social care professional education programs graduate practitioners who have the competence and capability to practice effectively in interprofessional collaborative teams. Academic institutions are responding by offering interprofessional education (IPE); however, there is as yet no consensus regarding optimal strategies for the assessment of interprofessional learning (IPL). The Program Committee for the 17th Ottawa Conference in Perth, Australia in March, 2016, invited IPE champions to debate and discuss the current status of the assessment of IPL. A draft statement from this workshop was further discussed at the global All Together Better Health VIII conference in Oxford, UK in September, 2016. The outcomes of these deliberations and a final round of electronic consultation informed the work of a core group of international IPE leaders to develop this document. The consensus statement we present here is the result of the synthesized views of experts and global colleagues. It outlines the challenges and difficulties but endorses a set of desired learning outcome categories and methods of assessment that can be adapted to individual contexts and resources. The points of consensus focus on pre-qualification (pre-licensure) health professional students but may be transferable into post-qualification arenas. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=trh&AN=122343201 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1270441 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 347 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Interprofessional education Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational outcomes Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Consensus (Social sciences) Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional education Type: general – SubjectFull: Allied health personnel Type: general – SubjectFull: Debate Type: general – SubjectFull: Discussion Type: general – SubjectFull: Curriculum Type: general – SubjectFull: Interdisciplinary education Type: general – SubjectFull: Interprofessional relations Type: general – SubjectFull: Reflection (Philosophy) Type: general – SubjectFull: Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Rating of students Type: general – SubjectFull: Teams in the workplace Type: general – SubjectFull: Adult education workshops Type: general – SubjectFull: World Wide Web Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Type: general – SubjectFull: Information resources Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional practice Type: general – SubjectFull: Health occupations school faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher development Type: general – SubjectFull: Australia Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom Type: general – SubjectFull: North America Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rogers, Gary D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thistlethwaite, Jill E. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Anderson, Elizabeth S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Abrandt Dahlgren, Madeleine – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Grymonpre, Ruby E. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Moran, Monica – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Samarasekera, Dujeepa D. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Text: Apr2017 Type: published Y: 2017 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0142159X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 39 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Medical Teacher Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |