La autorregulación extrínseca en la empresa periodística. La experiencia del Grupo 16.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: La autorregulación extrínseca en la empresa periodística. La experiencia del Grupo 16. (Spanish).
Alternate Title: Extrinsic Self-regulation in Journalistic Ventures. The Grupo 16 Experience. (English)
Authors: Maciá-Barber, Carlos
Source: Palabra Clave. dic2009, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p269-286. 18p. 2 Charts.
Subjects: JOURNALISM, PRESS, DUTY, OMBUDSPERSONS
Geographic Terms: SPAIN
Abstract (English): It is not often that a media organization equips itself with an internal system for self-regulation such as a press ombudsman. Rarely is someone appointed from outside the editorial department (consistent with the archetype advocated by The Washington Post), and the designation of a person who is not a member of the profession is an exceptional event (as in the case of Il Messaggero). There was a pioneering and unique experience in Spain that combined both these factors. Baptized as the Readers' Correspondent, it was brought about through the creation of Grupo 16. The benefits of that initiative included, among others, the nature of the position, the selection of those chosen to occupy it, readers' familiarization with the task of journalism and their right to information, and encouragement to interaction with the audience. The shortcomings concerned the absence of regulations, a certain amount of confusion in fulfilling the mission entrusted to the ombudsman, poor participation on the part of the public, not enough articles published, and the paltry manifestation of explanations provided by directors and writers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): Resulta infrecuente que un medio se dote de un sistema de autorregulación interno como es el ombudsman de prensa; una rareza, el nombramiento de alguien ajeno a la redacción (conforme al arquetipo propugnado por The Washington Post); y un acontecimiento excepcional, que la persona designada no pertenezca al colectivo profesional (como en Il Messaggero). Existió una experiencia pionera y única en España, bautizada como Corresponsal de los Lectores, en la corporación Grupo 16, que aunó ambos factores. Entre las bondades de la iniciativa destacó la naturaleza de la figura, la elección de quienes desempeñaron el cargo, la familiarización del lector con el quehacer periodístico y sus derechos en materia informativa, y el fomento de la interactividad con la audiencia; entre las carencias, la ausencia de regulación, cierta confusión en el ejercicio de la misión encomendada, la pobre participación del público, los insuficientes artículos que se publicaron, y el exiguo reflejo de las explicaciones de los directivos y redactores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Referencia Latina
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: zah
DbLabel: Referencia Latina
An: 51608393
RelevancyScore: 914
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 913.5
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: La autorregulación extrínseca en la empresa periodística. La experiencia del Grupo 16. <i>(Spanish). </i>
– Name: TitleAlt
  Label: Alternate Title
  Group: TiAlt
  Data: Extrinsic Self-regulation in Journalistic Ventures. The Grupo 16 Experience.<i> (English)</i>
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Maciá-Barber%2C+Carlos%22">Maciá-Barber, Carlos</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Palabra+Clave%22">Palabra Clave</searchLink>. dic2009, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p269-286. 18p. 2 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22JOURNALISM%22">JOURNALISM</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22PRESS%22">PRESS</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22DUTY%22">DUTY</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22OMBUDSPERSONS%22">OMBUDSPERSONS</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22SPAIN%22">SPAIN</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (English)
  Group: Ab
  Data: It is not often that a media organization equips itself with an internal system for self-regulation such as a press ombudsman. Rarely is someone appointed from outside the editorial department (consistent with the archetype advocated by The Washington Post), and the designation of a person who is not a member of the profession is an exceptional event (as in the case of Il Messaggero). There was a pioneering and unique experience in Spain that combined both these factors. Baptized as the Readers' Correspondent, it was brought about through the creation of Grupo 16. The benefits of that initiative included, among others, the nature of the position, the selection of those chosen to occupy it, readers' familiarization with the task of journalism and their right to information, and encouragement to interaction with the audience. The shortcomings concerned the absence of regulations, a certain amount of confusion in fulfilling the mission entrusted to the ombudsman, poor participation on the part of the public, not enough articles published, and the paltry manifestation of explanations provided by directors and writers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (Spanish)
  Group: Ab
  Data: Resulta infrecuente que un medio se dote de un sistema de autorregulación interno como es el ombudsman de prensa; una rareza, el nombramiento de alguien ajeno a la redacción (conforme al arquetipo propugnado por The Washington Post); y un acontecimiento excepcional, que la persona designada no pertenezca al colectivo profesional (como en Il Messaggero). Existió una experiencia pionera y única en España, bautizada como Corresponsal de los Lectores, en la corporación Grupo 16, que aunó ambos factores. Entre las bondades de la iniciativa destacó la naturaleza de la figura, la elección de quienes desempeñaron el cargo, la familiarización del lector con el quehacer periodístico y sus derechos en materia informativa, y el fomento de la interactividad con la audiencia; entre las carencias, la ausencia de regulación, cierta confusión en el ejercicio de la misión encomendada, la pobre participación del público, los insuficientes artículos que se publicaron, y el exiguo reflejo de las explicaciones de los directivos y redactores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=zah&AN=51608393
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Code: spa
        Text: Spanish
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 18
        StartPage: 269
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: JOURNALISM
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: PRESS
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: DUTY
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: OMBUDSPERSONS
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: SPAIN
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: La autorregulación extrínseca en la empresa periodística. La experiencia del Grupo 16.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Maciá-Barber, Carlos
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: dic2009
              Type: published
              Y: 2009
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01228285
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 12
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Palabra Clave
              Type: main
ResultId 1