View in EDS

Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cantabria de 31 de marzo de 2025 (Sala de lo Contencioso, Sección 1ª. Ponente: Clara Penín Alegre).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cantabria de 31 de marzo de 2025 (Sala de lo Contencioso, Sección 1ª. Ponente: Clara Penín Alegre).
Authors: Pascual Núñez, María1
Source: Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental. jun2025, Issue 157, p170-173. 4p.
Subject Terms: *Urban planning, *Wind power plants, Superior courts, Public interest, Legal judgments, Jurisdiction
Abstract (English): The article focuses on the ruling of the Superior Court of Justice of Cantabria dated March 31, 2025, which addresses a contentious-administrative appeal filed by the Platform for the Defense of Southern Cantabria against the authorization for the installation of the El Escudo wind farm on non-urbanizable land. The platform argued the lack of informed participation from those affected and the omission of strategic environmental assessment, among other points. The Court determined that its jurisdiction was limited to the specific authorization and concluded that there was no violation of urban planning regulations, considering that the installations are of public interest. Additionally, it was mentioned that Spanish legislation does not require requirements for regional-scale wind energy plans, which excludes the application of Directive 2001/42/EC on environmental impact assessment. [Extracted from the article]
Abstract (Spanish): El pronunciamiento que analizamos resuelve el recurso contencioso-administrativo interpuesto por la Plataforma para la Defensa del Sur de Cantabria contra la autorización para la instalación del parque eólico El Escudo en suelo no urbanizable de varios municipios. La parte recurrente argumenta la falta de participación informada de los afectados, aludiendo al catálogo de Montes de Utilidad Pública (MUP) y su propiedad pública, así como a la autorización para una ocupación industrial de montes del Catálogo de Utilidad Pública (CUP). En concreto, menciona el interés de la Plataforma y la solicitud de información conforme al Convenio de Aarhus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental is the property of CIEMAT, through its Centro Internacional de Estudios de Derecho Ambiental (CIEDA) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: 8gh
DbLabel: GreenFILE
An: 186401046
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cantabria de 31 de marzo de 2025 (Sala de lo Contencioso, Sección 1ª. Ponente: Clara Penín Alegre).
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pascual+Núñez%2C+María%22">Pascual Núñez, María</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Actualidad+Jurídica+Ambiental%22">Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental</searchLink>. jun2025, Issue 157, p170-173. 4p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Urban+planning%22">Urban planning</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Wind+power+plants%22">Wind power plants</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Superior+courts%22">Superior courts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+interest%22">Public interest</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Legal+judgments%22">Legal judgments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Jurisdiction%22">Jurisdiction</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (English)
  Group: Ab
  Data: The article focuses on the ruling of the Superior Court of Justice of Cantabria dated March 31, 2025, which addresses a contentious-administrative appeal filed by the Platform for the Defense of Southern Cantabria against the authorization for the installation of the El Escudo wind farm on non-urbanizable land. The platform argued the lack of informed participation from those affected and the omission of strategic environmental assessment, among other points. The Court determined that its jurisdiction was limited to the specific authorization and concluded that there was no violation of urban planning regulations, considering that the installations are of public interest. Additionally, it was mentioned that Spanish legislation does not require requirements for regional-scale wind energy plans, which excludes the application of Directive 2001/42/EC on environmental impact assessment. [Extracted from the article]
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (Spanish)
  Group: Ab
  Data: El pronunciamiento que analizamos resuelve el recurso contencioso-administrativo interpuesto por la Plataforma para la Defensa del Sur de Cantabria contra la autorización para la instalación del parque eólico El Escudo en suelo no urbanizable de varios municipios. La parte recurrente argumenta la falta de participación informada de los afectados, aludiendo al catálogo de Montes de Utilidad Pública (MUP) y su propiedad pública, así como a la autorización para una ocupación industrial de montes del Catálogo de Utilidad Pública (CUP). En concreto, menciona el interés de la Plataforma y la solicitud de información conforme al Convenio de Aarhus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental is the property of CIEMAT, through its Centro Internacional de Estudios de Derecho Ambiental (CIEDA) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=186401046
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Code: spa
        Text: Spanish
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 4
        StartPage: 170
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Urban planning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Wind power plants
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Superior courts
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public interest
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Legal judgments
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Jurisdiction
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cantabria de 31 de marzo de 2025 (Sala de lo Contencioso, Sección 1ª. Ponente: Clara Penín Alegre).
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pascual Núñez, María
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: jun2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 19895666
          Numbering:
            – Type: issue
              Value: 157
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental
              Type: main
ResultId 1