Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance diflufenican.
Saved in:
| Title: | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance diflufenican. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Álvarez, Fernando (AUTHOR), Arena, Maria (AUTHOR), Auteri, Domenica (AUTHOR), Leite, Sofia Batista (AUTHOR), Binaglia, Marco (AUTHOR), Castoldi, Anna Federica (AUTHOR), Chiusolo, Arianna (AUTHOR), Colagiorgi, Angelo (AUTHOR), Colas, Mathilde (AUTHOR), Crivellente, Federica (AUTHOR), De Lentdecker, Chloe (AUTHOR), De Magistris, Isabella (AUTHOR), Egsmose, Mark (AUTHOR), Fait, Gabriella (AUTHOR), Ferilli, Franco (AUTHOR), Santonja, German Giner (AUTHOR), Gouliarmou, Varvara (AUTHOR), Halling, Katrin (AUTHOR), Ippolito, Alessio (AUTHOR), Istace, Frederique (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | EFSA Journal. Feb2026, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p1-26. 26p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Pesticides, *Herbicides, *Pesticide residues in food, *Pesticide toxicology, *Crops, Government regulation, Scholarly peer review |
| Geographic Terms: | Czech Republic |
| Company/Entity: | European Union , European Food Safety Authority |
| Abstract: | The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State the United Kingdom and Czech Republic after Brexit, and co‐rapporteur Member State Czech Republic for the pesticide active substance diflufenican and the assessment of the confirmatory data following the Article 12 maximum residue levels (MRLs) review are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of diflufenican as a herbicide on cereal crops (spring wheat and barley; winter wheat and barley; rye, triticale, spelt (spring and winter); durum wheat). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and the assessment of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported where identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of EFSA Journal is the property of European Food Safety Authority and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | GreenFILE |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State the United Kingdom and Czech Republic after Brexit, and co‐rapporteur Member State Czech Republic for the pesticide active substance diflufenican and the assessment of the confirmatory data following the Article 12 maximum residue levels (MRLs) review are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of diflufenican as a herbicide on cereal crops (spring wheat and barley; winter wheat and barley; rye, triticale, spelt (spring and winter); durum wheat). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and the assessment of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported where identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 18314732 |
| DOI: | 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9758 |
