View in EDS

Signatures of the Anthropocene: Population Genomic Structure Detected in Pennsylvania Coyotes.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Signatures of the Anthropocene: Population Genomic Structure Detected in Pennsylvania Coyotes.
Authors: Marshall, Craig A.1 (AUTHOR), Halo, Julia2 (AUTHOR), Van Why, Kyle3 (AUTHOR), Loera, Yeraldi4 (AUTHOR), Tennenbaum, Stavi R.4 (AUTHOR), Burton, Casey4 (AUTHOR), Di Landro, Ariana4 (AUTHOR), Dominguez, Dominic4 (AUTHOR), Duncan, Daniel4 (AUTHOR), Machado, Madison4 (AUTHOR), Posada, Catalina4 (AUTHOR), Gaughran, Stephen J.4,5 (AUTHOR), Lichak, Madison4 (AUTHOR), Brzeski, Kristin6 (AUTHOR), Heppenheimer, Elizabeth4,7 (AUTHOR), vonHoldt, Bridgett4 (AUTHOR) vonholdt@princeton.edu
Source: Ecology & Evolution (20457758). Mar2026, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p1-12. 12p.
Subject Terms: *Anthropogenic effects on nature, *Human ecology, Population genetics, Genomics, Dispersal (Ecology), Coyote, Anthropocene Epoch
Geographic Terms: Great Lakes Region (North America), Pennsylvania, Northeastern States, United States
Abstract: Coyotes (Canis latrans) expanded across eastern North America in the last century and are ecological generalists capable of thriving across diverse habitats. Broad genetic surveillance has reported little spatial genetic patterning for this highly dispersive species. Here, we explore the genome‐wide signatures of spatial patterns found in a 10‐year study of 1199 coyotes from northeastern United States, with a temporal analysis of Pennsylvania coyotes. Despite their broad dispersal capability, we detected subtle but significant population structure, with two genetic clusters that have a weak clinal transition zone. This partitioning aligned qualitatively with patterns of human population density and activity. We inferred that gene flow between these genetic groups was associated with two different demographic expansions of coyotes eastward, south along the Great Lakes and separately along the northern Lakes towards northeastern United States. We identify Pennsylvania as a recent contact zone. Morphometric analyses revealed only modest differentiation between clusters and no robust temporal shifts, though a weak trend of increased body mass was noted in southwestern males. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that anthropogenic features likely influence fine‐scale cryptic population structure, even in a highly dispersing and widespread mesopredator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ecology & Evolution (20457758) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
Description
Abstract:Coyotes (Canis latrans) expanded across eastern North America in the last century and are ecological generalists capable of thriving across diverse habitats. Broad genetic surveillance has reported little spatial genetic patterning for this highly dispersive species. Here, we explore the genome‐wide signatures of spatial patterns found in a 10‐year study of 1199 coyotes from northeastern United States, with a temporal analysis of Pennsylvania coyotes. Despite their broad dispersal capability, we detected subtle but significant population structure, with two genetic clusters that have a weak clinal transition zone. This partitioning aligned qualitatively with patterns of human population density and activity. We inferred that gene flow between these genetic groups was associated with two different demographic expansions of coyotes eastward, south along the Great Lakes and separately along the northern Lakes towards northeastern United States. We identify Pennsylvania as a recent contact zone. Morphometric analyses revealed only modest differentiation between clusters and no robust temporal shifts, though a weak trend of increased body mass was noted in southwestern males. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that anthropogenic features likely influence fine‐scale cryptic population structure, even in a highly dispersing and widespread mesopredator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:20457758
DOI:10.1002/ece3.73216