RECENSIÓN: LUCEA FRANCO, PILAR. EL CONTROL JURISDICCIONAL DE LA PLANIFICACIÓN ENERGÉTICA EN FRANCIA Y ESPAÑA, REVISTA ARANZADI DE DERECHO AMBIENTAL, ESPECIAL MONOGRÁFICO, N° 34, AGOSTO 2025, EDITORIAL ARANZADI, 282 PÁGS.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: RECENSIÓN: LUCEA FRANCO, PILAR. EL CONTROL JURISDICCIONAL DE LA PLANIFICACIÓN ENERGÉTICA EN FRANCIA Y ESPAÑA, REVISTA ARANZADI DE DERECHO AMBIENTAL, ESPECIAL MONOGRÁFICO, N° 34, AGOSTO 2025, EDITORIAL ARANZADI, 282 PÁGS.
Authors: Ruiz, Andrea García1
Source: Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental. jui2026, Issue 168, p202-206. 5p.
Subject Terms: *Environmental law, *Renewable energy transition (Government policy), *Energy policy, Judicial review, Government policy, Spaniards, Administrative law, French history
Geographic Terms: Spain, France
Abstract (English): Pilar Lucea Franco's monograph focuses on the judicial review of energy-climate planning in France and Spain, analyzing how the courts oversee the legality and substantive adequacy of these plans. Through a comparative approach, the work examines the recours pour excès de pouvoir in France and the contentious-administrative appeal in Spain, highlighting the evolution of judicial control from formal legality towards the evaluation of the suitability of climate measures. Additionally, it addresses recent climate litigation, such as L’Affaire du Siècle in France and the Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan (PNIEC) in Spain, to illustrate the challenges and possibilities of judicial review in instruments of high technical complexity. The work offers an analytical framework that connects classical administrative law with the energy and climate transition, being useful for research on climate litigation, technical discretion, and complex public policies. [Extracted from the article]
Abstract (Spanish): La monografía de Pilar Lucea Franco se centra en el control jurisdiccional de la planificación energético-climática en Francia y España, analizando cómo los tribunales supervisan la legalidad y suficiencia material de estos planes. A través de un enfoque comparado, la obra examina el recours pour excès de pouvoir en Francia y el recurso contencioso-administrativo en España, destacando la evolución del control judicial desde la legalidad formal hacia la evaluación de la adecuación de las medidas climáticas. Además, aborda la litigación climática reciente, como L’Affaire du Siècle en Francia y el Plan Nacional Integrado de Energía y Clima (PNIEC) en España, para ilustrar los desafíos y posibilidades del control judicial en instrumentos de alta complejidad técnica. La obra ofrece un marco analítico que conecta el Derecho administrativo clásico con la transición energética y climática, siendo útil para investigaciones sobre litigación climática, discrecionalidad técnica y políticas públicas complejas. [Extracted from the article]
Copyright of Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental is the property of CIEMAT, through its Centro Internacional de Estudios de Derecho Ambiental (CIEDA) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
Description
Abstract:Pilar Lucea Franco's monograph focuses on the judicial review of energy-climate planning in France and Spain, analyzing how the courts oversee the legality and substantive adequacy of these plans. Through a comparative approach, the work examines the recours pour excès de pouvoir in France and the contentious-administrative appeal in Spain, highlighting the evolution of judicial control from formal legality towards the evaluation of the suitability of climate measures. Additionally, it addresses recent climate litigation, such as L’Affaire du Siècle in France and the Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan (PNIEC) in Spain, to illustrate the challenges and possibilities of judicial review in instruments of high technical complexity. The work offers an analytical framework that connects classical administrative law with the energy and climate transition, being useful for research on climate litigation, technical discretion, and complex public policies. [Extracted from the article]
ISSN:19895666
DOI:10.56398/ajacieda.00492