Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for nonacute low back pain: study protocol for a pilot multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pCRN study).

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for nonacute low back pain: study protocol for a pilot multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pCRN study).
Authors:	Byung-Cheul Shin^1,2, Me-riong Kim³, Jae-Heung Cho⁴, Jae-Young Jung⁴, Koh-Woon Kim⁴, Jun-Hwan Lee^5,6, Kibong Nam⁷, Min ho Lee⁷, Eui-Hyoung Hwang^1,2, Kwang-Ho Heo^1,2, Namkwen Kim⁸, In-Hyuk Ha³ hanihata@gmail.com, Shin, Byung-Cheul^1,2 (AUTHOR), Kim, Me-Riong⁹ (AUTHOR), Cho, Jae-Heung⁴ (AUTHOR), Jung, Jae-Young⁴ (AUTHOR), Kim, Koh-Woon⁴ (AUTHOR), Lee, Jun-Hwan^5,6 (AUTHOR), Nam, Kibong⁷ (AUTHOR), Lee, Min Ho⁷ (AUTHOR)
Source:	Trials. 1/17/2017, Vol. 18, p1-10. 10p. 2 Charts.
Database:	Academic Search Ultimate

Description
ISSN:	17456215
DOI:	10.1186/s13063-016-1756-8