CLASS ACTION LAW — ARTICLE III STANDING — NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT ABSENT CLASS MEMBERS MUST SATISFY ARTICLE III STANDING AT THE DAMAGES PHASE OF A CLASS ACTION. — Ramirez v. TransUnion LLC, 951 F.3d 1008 (9th Cir.), cert. granted in part, No. 20-297, 2020 WL 7366280 (U.S. Dec. 16, 2020) (mem.).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: CLASS ACTION LAW — ARTICLE III STANDING — NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT ABSENT CLASS MEMBERS MUST SATISFY ARTICLE III STANDING AT THE DAMAGES PHASE OF A CLASS ACTION. — Ramirez v. TransUnion LLC, 951 F.3d 1008 (9th Cir.), cert. granted in part, No. 20-297, 2020 WL 7366280 (U.S. Dec. 16, 2020) (mem.).
Source: Harvard Law Review. Jan2021, Vol. 134 Issue 3, p1286-1293. 8p.
Database: Academic Search Ultimate
Description
ISSN:0017811X