Late enhanced computed tomography in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy enables accurate left-ventricular volumetry.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Late enhanced computed tomography in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy enables accurate left-ventricular volumetry.
Authors: Langer, Christoph christoph.langer@uksh.de, Both, M.1, Harders, H.2, Lutz, M., Eden, M.2, Kühl, C., Sattler, B.1, Jansen, O1, Schaefer, P.1, Frey, N.
Source: European Radiology. Feb2015, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p575-584. 10p. 3 Black and White Photographs, 2 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subjects: Computed tomography, Hypertrophy, Cardiomyopathies, Myocardial infarction, Heart diseases
Abstract: Objectives: Late enhancement (LE) multi-slice computed tomography (leMDCT) was introduced for the visualization of (intra-) myocardial fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). LE is associated with adverse cardiac events. This analysis focuses on leMDCT derived LV muscle mass (LV-MM) which may be related to LE resulting in LE proportion for potential risk stratification in HCM. Methods: N=26 HCM-patients underwent leMDCT (64-slice-CT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). In leMDCT iodine contrast (Iopromid, 350 mg/mL; 150mL) was injected 7 minutes before imaging. Reconstructed short cardiac axis views served for planimetry. The study group was divided into three groups of varying LV-contrast. LeMDCT was correlated with CMR. Results: The mean age was 64.2 ± 14 years. The groups of varying contrast differed in weight and body mass index ( p < 0.05). In the group with good LV-contrast assessment of LV-MM resulted in 147.4 ± 64.8 g in leMDCT vs. 147.1 ± 65.9 in CMR ( p > 0.05). In the group with sufficient contrast LV-MM appeared with 172 ± 30.8 g in leMDCT vs. 165.9 ± 37.8 in CMR ( p > 0.05). Overall intra-/inter-observer variability of semiautomatic assessment of LV-MM showed an accuracy of 0.9 ± 8.6 g and 0.8 ± 9.2 g in leMDCT. All leMDCT-measures correlated well with CMR ( r > 0.9). Conclusions: LeMDCT primarily performed for LE-visualization in HCM allows for accurate LV-volumetry including LV-MM in > 90 % of the cases. Key Points: • LeMDCT of relatively low contrast allows for LV planimetry in HCM. • The correlation of leMDCT-based LV volumetry with gold-standard CMR was excellent (r > 0.9). • LeMDCT requires approximately 2.0mL/kgBW of dye to achieve acceptable contrast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Objectives: Late enhancement (LE) multi-slice computed tomography (leMDCT) was introduced for the visualization of (intra-) myocardial fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). LE is associated with adverse cardiac events. This analysis focuses on leMDCT derived LV muscle mass (LV-MM) which may be related to LE resulting in LE proportion for potential risk stratification in HCM. Methods: N=26 HCM-patients underwent leMDCT (64-slice-CT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). In leMDCT iodine contrast (Iopromid, 350 mg/mL; 150mL) was injected 7 minutes before imaging. Reconstructed short cardiac axis views served for planimetry. The study group was divided into three groups of varying LV-contrast. LeMDCT was correlated with CMR. Results: The mean age was 64.2 ± 14 years. The groups of varying contrast differed in weight and body mass index ( p < 0.05). In the group with good LV-contrast assessment of LV-MM resulted in 147.4 ± 64.8 g in leMDCT vs. 147.1 ± 65.9 in CMR ( p > 0.05). In the group with sufficient contrast LV-MM appeared with 172 ± 30.8 g in leMDCT vs. 165.9 ± 37.8 in CMR ( p > 0.05). Overall intra-/inter-observer variability of semiautomatic assessment of LV-MM showed an accuracy of 0.9 ± 8.6 g and 0.8 ± 9.2 g in leMDCT. All leMDCT-measures correlated well with CMR ( r > 0.9). Conclusions: LeMDCT primarily performed for LE-visualization in HCM allows for accurate LV-volumetry including LV-MM in > 90 % of the cases. Key Points: • LeMDCT of relatively low contrast allows for LV planimetry in HCM. • The correlation of leMDCT-based LV volumetry with gold-standard CMR was excellent (r > 0.9). • LeMDCT requires approximately 2.0mL/kgBW of dye to achieve acceptable contrast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09387994
DOI:10.1007/s00330-014-3434-0