View in EDS

Influence of concrete matrix and type of fiber on the shear behavior of self-compacting fiber reinforced concrete beams.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Influence of concrete matrix and type of fiber on the shear behavior of self-compacting fiber reinforced concrete beams.
Authors: Cuenca, E.1 cuenca.estefania@gmail.com, Echegaray-Oviedo, J.1 jaecov@upv.es, Serna, P.1 pserna@cst.upv.es
Source: Composites: Part B, Engineering. Jun2015, Vol. 75, p135-147. 13p.
Subjects: Concrete beams, Fiber-reinforced concrete, Shear (Mechanics), Strength of materials, Flexural strength
Abstract: Steel fibers are known to improve shear behavior. The Design Codes (Eurocode 2 (EC2), Spanish EHE-08, Model Code 2010 and RILEM approach) have developed formulas to calculate the fiber contribution to shear, mainly focused on standard FRCs, i.e. medium strength concretes with a low content of normal strength steel fibers. However, in real applications other combinations are possible, such as high or medium strength concretes with high strength steel fibers of different lengths and geometry. An experimental program consisting of 12 self-compacting fiber reinforced concrete (SCFRC) I-type beams was carried out. All the beams had the same geometry and fiber content (50 kg/m 3 ), and they were made with two different concrete compressive strength values and five different types of steel fibers and were tested for shear. The main conclusions reached were that the type of fiber substantially affects shear behavior, even when the Design Code formulas indicate similar contributions. The combination of high strength concrete matrixes with low strength fibers does not seem to be efficient. Also, the use of high residual flexural tensile strength values (e.g. f R3 or f R4 ) does not appear to be the most accurate reference value to calculate the beam shear strength in these cases. The present Design Codes consider standard FRCs, but their formulas should be revised for concretes with fibers of different strengths, slenderness and geometry, since these properties substantially affect shear behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Composites: Part B, Engineering is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Steel fibers are known to improve shear behavior. The Design Codes (Eurocode 2 (EC2), Spanish EHE-08, Model Code 2010 and RILEM approach) have developed formulas to calculate the fiber contribution to shear, mainly focused on standard FRCs, i.e. medium strength concretes with a low content of normal strength steel fibers. However, in real applications other combinations are possible, such as high or medium strength concretes with high strength steel fibers of different lengths and geometry. An experimental program consisting of 12 self-compacting fiber reinforced concrete (SCFRC) I-type beams was carried out. All the beams had the same geometry and fiber content (50 kg/m 3 ), and they were made with two different concrete compressive strength values and five different types of steel fibers and were tested for shear. The main conclusions reached were that the type of fiber substantially affects shear behavior, even when the Design Code formulas indicate similar contributions. The combination of high strength concrete matrixes with low strength fibers does not seem to be efficient. Also, the use of high residual flexural tensile strength values (e.g. f R3 or f R4 ) does not appear to be the most accurate reference value to calculate the beam shear strength in these cases. The present Design Codes consider standard FRCs, but their formulas should be revised for concretes with fibers of different strengths, slenderness and geometry, since these properties substantially affect shear behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:13598368
DOI:10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.037