View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy versus conventional CT-guided lung biopsy: a prospective controlled study to assess radiation doses and diagnostic performance.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy versus conventional CT-guided lung biopsy: a prospective controlled study to assess radiation doses and diagnostic performance.
Authors: Kim GR (AUTHOR), Hur J (AUTHOR), Lee SM (AUTHOR), Lee HJ (AUTHOR), Hong YJ (AUTHOR), Nam JE (AUTHOR), Kim HS (AUTHOR), Kim YJ (AUTHOR), Choi BW (AUTHOR), Kim TH (AUTHOR), Choe KO (AUTHOR), Kim, Ga Ram1 (AUTHOR), Hur, Jin (AUTHOR), Lee, Sang Min (AUTHOR), Lee, Hye-Jeong (AUTHOR), Hong, Yoo Jin (AUTHOR), Nam, Ji Eun (AUTHOR), Kim, Hua Sun (AUTHOR), Kim, Young Jin (AUTHOR), Choi, Byoung Wook (AUTHOR)
Source: European Radiology. Feb2011, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p232-239. 8p.
Abstract: Objective: We evaluated radiation doses, complication rates, and diagnostic accuracy for CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy (NAB) procedures of pulmonary lesions performed with or without fluoroscopic guidance.Methods: A total of 142 patients were prospectively enrolled to receive CT-guided NAB with (Group I, n = 72) or without (Group II, n = 70) fluoroscopic guidance. Outcome measurements were patient and doctor radiation dose, and complication rate. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated based on 123 NAB results.Results: The mean estimated effective patient radiation dose was 6.53 mSv in Group I and 2.72 mSv in Group II (p < 0.001). The mean estimated effective doctor dose was 0.054 mSv in Group I and 0.029 mSv in Group II (p < 0.001). The complication rate was significantly different between the two groups (13.4% versus 31.4%, p = 0.012). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing pulmonary lesions were 97.8%, 100% and 98.4% in group I and 95.3%, 100% and 89.5% in group II (p > 0.05).Conclusions: CT fluoroscopy-guided NAB of pulmonary lesions provides high diagnostic accuracy and can be performed with significantly fewer complications. However, radiation exposure to both patient and doctor were significantly higher than conventional CT-guided NAB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:<bold>Objective: </bold>We evaluated radiation doses, complication rates, and diagnostic accuracy for CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy (NAB) procedures of pulmonary lesions performed with or without fluoroscopic guidance.<bold>Methods: </bold>A total of 142 patients were prospectively enrolled to receive CT-guided NAB with (Group I, n = 72) or without (Group II, n = 70) fluoroscopic guidance. Outcome measurements were patient and doctor radiation dose, and complication rate. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated based on 123 NAB results.<bold>Results: </bold>The mean estimated effective patient radiation dose was 6.53 mSv in Group I and 2.72 mSv in Group II (p < 0.001). The mean estimated effective doctor dose was 0.054 mSv in Group I and 0.029 mSv in Group II (p < 0.001). The complication rate was significantly different between the two groups (13.4% versus 31.4%, p = 0.012). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing pulmonary lesions were 97.8%, 100% and 98.4% in group I and 95.3%, 100% and 89.5% in group II (p > 0.05).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>CT fluoroscopy-guided NAB of pulmonary lesions provides high diagnostic accuracy and can be performed with significantly fewer complications. However, radiation exposure to both patient and doctor were significantly higher than conventional CT-guided NAB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09387994
DOI:10.1007/s00330-010-1936-y