PS directory: a scalable multilevel directory cache for CMPs.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	PS directory: a scalable multilevel directory cache for CMPs.
Authors:	Valls, Joan¹ joavalmo@fiv.upv.es, Ros, Alberto² aros@ditec.um.es, Sahuquillo, Julio¹ jsahuqui@disca.upv.es, Gómez, María¹ megomez@disca.upv.es
Source:	Journal of Supercomputing. Aug2015, Vol. 71 Issue 8, p2847-2876. 30p.
Subjects:	Performance of multiprocessors, Directory services (Computer network technology), Scalability, Computer networks, Energy consumption, Static random access memory chips
Abstract:	As the number of cores increases in current and future chip-multiprocessor (CMP) generations, coherence protocols must rely on novel hardware structures to scale in terms of performance, power, and area. Systems that use directory information for coherence purposes are currently the most scalable alternative. This paper studies the important differences between the directory behavior of private and shared blocks, which claim for a separate management of both types of blocks at the directory. We propose the PS directory, a two-level directory cache that keeps the reduced number of frequently accessed shared entries in a small and fast first-level cache, namely Shared cache, and uses a larger and slower second-level Private cache to track the large amount of private blocks. Entries in the Private cache do not implement the sharer vector, which allows important silicon area savings. Speed and area reasons suggest the use of eDRAM technology, much denser but slower than SRAM technology, for the Private cache, which in turn brings energy savings. Experimental results for a 16-core CMP show that, compared to a conventional directory, the PS directory improves performance by 14 $$\%$$ while reducing silicon area and energy consumption by 34 and 27 $$\%$$ , respectively. Also, compared to the state-of-the-art Multi-Grain Directory, the PS directory apart from increasing performance, it reduces power by 18.7 $$\%$$ , and provides more scalability in terms of area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Journal of Supercomputing is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Engineering Source

Description
Abstract:	As the number of cores increases in current and future chip-multiprocessor (CMP) generations, coherence protocols must rely on novel hardware structures to scale in terms of performance, power, and area. Systems that use directory information for coherence purposes are currently the most scalable alternative. This paper studies the important differences between the directory behavior of private and shared blocks, which claim for a separate management of both types of blocks at the directory. We propose the PS directory, a two-level directory cache that keeps the reduced number of frequently accessed shared entries in a small and fast first-level cache, namely Shared cache, and uses a larger and slower second-level Private cache to track the large amount of private blocks. Entries in the Private cache do not implement the sharer vector, which allows important silicon area savings. Speed and area reasons suggest the use of eDRAM technology, much denser but slower than SRAM technology, for the Private cache, which in turn brings energy savings. Experimental results for a 16-core CMP show that, compared to a conventional directory, the PS directory improves performance by 14 $$\%$$ while reducing silicon area and energy consumption by 34 and 27 $$\%$$ , respectively. Also, compared to the state-of-the-art Multi-Grain Directory, the PS directory apart from increasing performance, it reduces power by 18.7 $$\%$$ , and provides more scalability in terms of area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	09208542
DOI:	10.1007/s11227-014-1332-5