A NOTE ON THE CALCULATION OF CONSISTENT TANGENT OPERATORS FOR VON MISES AND DRUCKER--PRAGER PLASTICITY.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A NOTE ON THE CALCULATION OF CONSISTENT TANGENT OPERATORS FOR VON MISES AND DRUCKER--PRAGER PLASTICITY.
Authors: de Borst, RenÉ1, Groen, Arend E.2
Source: Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering. Dec94, Vol. 10 Issue 12, p1021-1025. 5p.
Subjects: Tangential coordinates, Contact transformations, Material plasticity, Numerical integration, Numerical analysis, Matrices (Mathematics)
Abstract: A comparison is made of implementations of consistent tangent operators that arise in implicit integration of Von Mises and Drucker-Prager yield criteria. When computing the consistent tangent operator a matrix inversion has to be performed at integration point level. The consequences of different formulations of the consistent tangent operator on the numerical accuracy are assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:A comparison is made of implementations of consistent tangent operators that arise in implicit integration of Von Mises and Drucker-Prager yield criteria. When computing the consistent tangent operator a matrix inversion has to be performed at integration point level. The consequences of different formulations of the consistent tangent operator on the numerical accuracy are assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10698299
DOI:10.1002/cnm.1640101208