View in EDS

Quantitative pore‐type characterization from well logs based on the seismic petrophysics in a carbonate reservoir.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Quantitative pore‐type characterization from well logs based on the seismic petrophysics in a carbonate reservoir.
Authors: Mirkamali, Maryam Sadat1 (AUTHOR), Javaherian, Abdolrahim1,2 (AUTHOR) javaheri@ut.ac.ir, Hassani, Hossein3 (AUTHOR), Saberi, Mohammad Reza4 (AUTHOR), Hosseini, Seyed Abolfazl5 (AUTHOR)
Source: Geophysical Prospecting. Sep2020, Vol. 68 Issue 7, p2195-2216. 22p. 4 Color Photographs, 3 Diagrams, 11 Graphs.
Subjects: Carbonate reservoirs, Petroleum reservoirs, Data logging, Physics
Geographic Terms: Iran
Abstract: Quality, availability and consistency of the measured and interpreted well log data are essential in the seismic reservoir characterization methods, and seismic petrophysics is the recommended workflow to achieve data consistency between logs and seismic domains. This paper uses seismic petrophysics workflow to improve well logs and pore geometry interpretations for an oil carbonate reservoir in the Fahliyan Formation in the southwest of Iran. The petrophysical interpreted well logs, rock physics and well‐to‐seismic tie analysis are integrated into the proposed workflow. Our implementation incorporates revising petrophysical well log interpretations and updating pore geometry characteristics to obtain a better well‐tie quality. We first propose an improved pore‐type characterization approach based on both P‐ and S‐wave velocities for quantifying pore geometry. Then, seismic logs are estimated accordingly, and the results are used in the well‐to‐seismic analysis. The quality of the well‐tie is improved, furthermore, by iterating on the petrophysical interpreted well logs as well as the calculated pore geometries. For the intervals with high‐quality data, our workflow improves the consistency between the results of measured and modelled seismic logs. For the intervals with problematic well logs, the application of our proposed workflow results in the successful replacement of the poor data and subsequently leads to an improved wavelet estimation and well‐tie results. In both cases, a higher quantification of pore geometries is achieved, which in turn is confirmed by the core images and formation micro‐imager analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Geophysical Prospecting is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Quality, availability and consistency of the measured and interpreted well log data are essential in the seismic reservoir characterization methods, and seismic petrophysics is the recommended workflow to achieve data consistency between logs and seismic domains. This paper uses seismic petrophysics workflow to improve well logs and pore geometry interpretations for an oil carbonate reservoir in the Fahliyan Formation in the southwest of Iran. The petrophysical interpreted well logs, rock physics and well‐to‐seismic tie analysis are integrated into the proposed workflow. Our implementation incorporates revising petrophysical well log interpretations and updating pore geometry characteristics to obtain a better well‐tie quality. We first propose an improved pore‐type characterization approach based on both P‐ and S‐wave velocities for quantifying pore geometry. Then, seismic logs are estimated accordingly, and the results are used in the well‐to‐seismic analysis. The quality of the well‐tie is improved, furthermore, by iterating on the petrophysical interpreted well logs as well as the calculated pore geometries. For the intervals with high‐quality data, our workflow improves the consistency between the results of measured and modelled seismic logs. For the intervals with problematic well logs, the application of our proposed workflow results in the successful replacement of the poor data and subsequently leads to an improved wavelet estimation and well‐tie results. In both cases, a higher quantification of pore geometries is achieved, which in turn is confirmed by the core images and formation micro‐imager analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00168025
DOI:10.1111/1365-2478.12989