Rectal endometriosis: predictive MRI signs for segmental bowel resection.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Rectal endometriosis: predictive MRI signs for segmental bowel resection.
Authors: Rousset, Pascal1,2,3 (AUTHOR) pascal.rousset@chu-lyon.fr, Buisson, Guillaume1,2,3 (AUTHOR), Lega, Jean-Christophe1,2,4 (AUTHOR), Charlot, Mathilde2,3 (AUTHOR), Gallice, Colin1,2,5 (AUTHOR), Cotte, Eddy1,2,6 (AUTHOR), Milot, Laurent1,2,3 (AUTHOR), Golfier, François1,2,5 (AUTHOR)
Source: European Radiology. 2021, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p884-894. 11p. 2 Black and White Photographs, 6 Charts.
Subjects: Receiver operating characteristic curves, Endometriosis, Rectal prolapse, Magnetic resonance imaging, Ureter diseases
Abstract: Objective: To retrospectively determine the accuracy of MRI rectal and pararectal signs in predicting the necessity for segmental resection in the case of lesions located in the rectum. Methods: MR images of consecutive patients treated for rectal endometriosis over a 5-year period were reviewed in consensus by two blinded readers. A systematic analysis of 7 rectal (lesion length, transverse axis, thickness and circumference, and presence of a convex base, submucosal oedema and hyperintense cystic areas) and 4 pararectal (posterior vaginal fornix, parametrial, ureteral and sacro-recto-genital septum involvements) signs was performed for each lesion. MRI results were compared to the surgical procedure performed (shaving versus segmental resection). Results: Among 61 patients studied, 32 received a segmental resection and 29, a shaving. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis allowed determining cut-off values for length (≥ 32 mm), transverse axis (≥ 22 mm), thickness (≥ 14 mm) and circumference (≥ 3/8 radii). The 7 rectal signs, and only the sacro-recto-genital septum pararectal sign, were significantly associated with segmental resection in univariate analysis, nodular thickness ≥ 14 mm and circumference ≥ 3/8 radii being the most predictive signs (odds ratio 94.5 and 60.4, respectively). These 2 signs remained positively associated with segmental resection in multivariate analysis and, when combined, were predictive of segmental resection with an accuracy of 90.2%. Conclusion: Assessing MRI rectal and pararectal signs may accurately predict the need for segmental resection versus a more conservative approach such as shaving for rectal lesion management. Key Points: • MRI analysis of rectal endometriosis, taking into account rectal and pararectal signs, may assist surgeons in the decision-making process, in counselling patients regarding the surgical procedure and in adequately allocating resources. • Among rectal signs, nodular thickness ≥ 14 mm and a circumference ≥ 38% were the most predictive signs of segmental resection. • Among pararectal signs, only the sacro-recto-genital septum involvement was significantly associated with segmental resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Objective: To retrospectively determine the accuracy of MRI rectal and pararectal signs in predicting the necessity for segmental resection in the case of lesions located in the rectum. Methods: MR images of consecutive patients treated for rectal endometriosis over a 5-year period were reviewed in consensus by two blinded readers. A systematic analysis of 7 rectal (lesion length, transverse axis, thickness and circumference, and presence of a convex base, submucosal oedema and hyperintense cystic areas) and 4 pararectal (posterior vaginal fornix, parametrial, ureteral and sacro-recto-genital septum involvements) signs was performed for each lesion. MRI results were compared to the surgical procedure performed (shaving versus segmental resection). Results: Among 61 patients studied, 32 received a segmental resection and 29, a shaving. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis allowed determining cut-off values for length (≥ 32 mm), transverse axis (≥ 22 mm), thickness (≥ 14 mm) and circumference (≥ 3/8 radii). The 7 rectal signs, and only the sacro-recto-genital septum pararectal sign, were significantly associated with segmental resection in univariate analysis, nodular thickness ≥ 14 mm and circumference ≥ 3/8 radii being the most predictive signs (odds ratio 94.5 and 60.4, respectively). These 2 signs remained positively associated with segmental resection in multivariate analysis and, when combined, were predictive of segmental resection with an accuracy of 90.2%. Conclusion: Assessing MRI rectal and pararectal signs may accurately predict the need for segmental resection versus a more conservative approach such as shaving for rectal lesion management. Key Points: • MRI analysis of rectal endometriosis, taking into account rectal and pararectal signs, may assist surgeons in the decision-making process, in counselling patients regarding the surgical procedure and in adequately allocating resources. • Among rectal signs, nodular thickness ≥ 14 mm and a circumference ≥ 38% were the most predictive signs of segmental resection. • Among pararectal signs, only the sacro-recto-genital septum involvement was significantly associated with segmental resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09387994
DOI:10.1007/s00330-020-07170-4