View in EDS

Effect of sampling time jitter on robust [formula omitted] filtering estimates.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Effect of sampling time jitter on robust [formula omitted] filtering estimates.
Authors:	Pale-Ramon, Eli G.¹ (AUTHOR), Ortega-Contreras, Jorge A.¹ (AUTHOR), Uribe-Murcia, Karen J.¹ (AUTHOR), Shmaliy, Yuriy S.¹ (AUTHOR) shmaliy@ugto.mx
Source:	Signal Processing. Sep2022, Vol. 198, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subjects:	Blood sugar monitoring, Blood sugar, Blood sugar monitors, Discrete time filters, Impulse response, Measurement errors
Abstract:	• Fractional time jitter proportionally affects the accuracy of filtering estimates. • The robust H2-OFIR filter mitigates timing jitter better than OFIR filter. • In most of the cases, the large timing jitter of 10% can be neglected. • Robust state estimators should be used when timing jitter is larger than 10%. • Jitter in glucose level measurements does not exceed 4% and can be neglected. In discrete-time processes, the sampling time jitter occurs naturally due to various unavoidable reasons, which make the model uncertain. Therefore, robust state estimators should be used. To find out if it is rational to design such estimators or if we can simply ignore the time jitter, in this paper we investigate its effect on the robust H 2 optimal finite impulse response (OFIR) filter in a comparison with the OFIR filter. As benchmarks, we also use the maximum likelihood FIR, unbiased FIR, and Kalman filters. The robust batch H 2 -OFIR filter is developed for timing jitter under disturbances, initial errors, and measurement errors. For Gaussian errors, its iterative algorithm is designed using modified Kalman recursions. Numerical investigations and applications to blood sugar monitoring in diabetic patients with daily timing jitter have shown that the robust H 2 -OFIR filter improves the accuracy of the OFIR filter by the factor of less than the fractional time jitter. That is, for large fractional timing jitter of 10 % the improvement would be less than 10 % that is small. Otherwise, it is worth using robust estimators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Signal Processing is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Engineering Source

Description
Abstract:	• Fractional time jitter proportionally affects the accuracy of filtering estimates. • The robust H2-OFIR filter mitigates timing jitter better than OFIR filter. • In most of the cases, the large timing jitter of 10% can be neglected. • Robust state estimators should be used when timing jitter is larger than 10%. • Jitter in glucose level measurements does not exceed 4% and can be neglected. In discrete-time processes, the sampling time jitter occurs naturally due to various unavoidable reasons, which make the model uncertain. Therefore, robust state estimators should be used. To find out if it is rational to design such estimators or if we can simply ignore the time jitter, in this paper we investigate its effect on the robust H 2 optimal finite impulse response (OFIR) filter in a comparison with the OFIR filter. As benchmarks, we also use the maximum likelihood FIR, unbiased FIR, and Kalman filters. The robust batch H 2 -OFIR filter is developed for timing jitter under disturbances, initial errors, and measurement errors. For Gaussian errors, its iterative algorithm is designed using modified Kalman recursions. Numerical investigations and applications to blood sugar monitoring in diabetic patients with daily timing jitter have shown that the robust H 2 -OFIR filter improves the accuracy of the OFIR filter by the factor of less than the fractional time jitter. That is, for large fractional timing jitter of 10 % the improvement would be less than 10 % that is small. Otherwise, it is worth using robust estimators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	01651684
DOI:	10.1016/j.sigpro.2022.108597