Pilot‐aided 1 × 2 and 2 × 2 space‐time line code systems with transmit antenna selection.
Saved in:
| Title: | Pilot‐aided 1 × 2 and 2 × 2 space‐time line code systems with transmit antenna selection. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Xu, Hongjun1 (AUTHOR), Pillay, Narushan1 (AUTHOR) pillayn@ukzn.ac.za, Yang, Fengfan2 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | International Journal of Communication Systems. 3/10/2023, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p1-17. 17p. |
| Subjects: | Space-time codes, Transmitting antennas, Symbol error rate, Quadrature amplitude modulation, Transmitters (Communication), Error probability |
| Abstract: | Summary: The space‐time line code (STLC), which has been recently proposed in the literature, assumes fully known channel state information at the transmitter and not the receiver. However, the effective channel gain is still required at the receiver to coherently detect M‐ary quadrature amplitude modulation (MQAM) symbols. In this paper, we propose pilot‐aided STLC systems, which do not require the effective channel gain at the receiver to detect the MQAM symbols. In order to further improve the error performance of the proposed schemes, we present the pilot‐aided STLC systems with transmit antenna selection (TAS). Using a more direct and simpler approach, we derive the average symbol error probability (ASEP) of the coherent 1×2 STLC systems with TAS, which represents the lower bound of the pilot‐aided 1×2 STLC systems with TAS. For comparison, in a similar manner, we also derive the ASEP of the coherent 2×2 STLC systems without TAS, which represents the lower bound of the pilot‐aided 2×2 STLC systems. For pilot‐aided 1×2 STLC systems with TAS, the gap between the simulated symbol error rate (SER) and the derived theoretical ASEP lower bound is very small. For a given number of transmit antennas, the simulated SER and theoretical ASEP also show that the error performance of the pilot‐aided 2×2 STLC systems with or without TAS is superior to the pilot‐aided 1×2 STLC systems with TAS by at least 1.8 dB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of International Journal of Communication Systems is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Summary: The space‐time line code (STLC), which has been recently proposed in the literature, assumes fully known channel state information at the transmitter and not the receiver. However, the effective channel gain is still required at the receiver to coherently detect M‐ary quadrature amplitude modulation (MQAM) symbols. In this paper, we propose pilot‐aided STLC systems, which do not require the effective channel gain at the receiver to detect the MQAM symbols. In order to further improve the error performance of the proposed schemes, we present the pilot‐aided STLC systems with transmit antenna selection (TAS). Using a more direct and simpler approach, we derive the average symbol error probability (ASEP) of the coherent 1×2 STLC systems with TAS, which represents the lower bound of the pilot‐aided 1×2 STLC systems with TAS. For comparison, in a similar manner, we also derive the ASEP of the coherent 2×2 STLC systems without TAS, which represents the lower bound of the pilot‐aided 2×2 STLC systems. For pilot‐aided 1×2 STLC systems with TAS, the gap between the simulated symbol error rate (SER) and the derived theoretical ASEP lower bound is very small. For a given number of transmit antennas, the simulated SER and theoretical ASEP also show that the error performance of the pilot‐aided 2×2 STLC systems with or without TAS is superior to the pilot‐aided 1×2 STLC systems with TAS by at least 1.8 dB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 10745351 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/dac.5398 |
