View in EDS

Performance evaluation and applicability of Lichens GO, a citizen science-based protocol for urban air quality monitoring.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Performance evaluation and applicability of Lichens GO, a citizen science-based protocol for urban air quality monitoring.
Authors: Counoy, Hugo1 (AUTHOR), Turcati, Laure2 (AUTHOR), Lorrillière, Romain3 (AUTHOR), Bénateau, Simon3 (AUTHOR), Maalouf, Jean-Paul4 (AUTHOR), Agnello, Grégory5 (AUTHOR), Turpin, Sébastien6 (AUTHOR), Agnan, Yannick1 (AUTHOR) yannick.agnan@biogeoscience.eu
Source: Ecological Indicators. Jun2023, Vol. 150, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subjects: Air quality monitoring, Lichens, Species diversity, French people, Forest biodiversity, Physiological adaptation
Abstract: [Display omitted] • Ecological metrics and interpretation were biased by the sampling effort reduction. • Lichens GO underestimated the lichen richness and acidophilous species proportion. • An increase of the distance between trees can extend the sampling site availability. • We suggested a series of adaptations for the Lichens GO identification key. • Response on acidophilous species proportion and functional diversity were improved. The Lichens GO program is a French citizen science initiative based on the European guidelines that aims to evaluate the lichen diversity for urban air quality monitoring. In this study, we assessed the performance and applicability of the current Lichens GO protocol to then propose adaptations to make it more reliable and feasible for citizen science. To achieve this goal, we considered four aspects of the citizen science program: potential protocol simplifications, sampling site availability, observer bias, and volunteer feedbacks. Simulated simplification scenarios from a reference data set highlighted the large influence of reducing the number of sampled trees on taxonomic and functional structure metrics compared to reducing the number of sampled tree exposure sides and considered lichen species list. When considering the Lichens GO protocol (i.e., three trees, four exposure sides, Lichens GO species list) compared to the reference data set (i.e., five trees, four exposure sides, exhaustive species list), we evaluated an underestimation of lichen species richness (−25%), acidophilous species proportion (−94%), and functional diversity (−21%). In parallel, the maximum distance between sampled trees did not influence the taxonomic and functional structure metrics when considering a homogeneous sampling area (i.e., similar light or shade conditions). Finally, we compared Lichens GO relevés from 25 volunteers in the same site to highlight the major identification difficulties that could compromise the ecological interpretation. To improve the quality of data collected by citizens without increasing the sampling effort, we suggest to: (1) increase the maximum distance between trees from 10 to 50 m to extend the sampling site availability; (2) adapt the Lichens GO identification key to limit species confusion; and (3) assign an ecological trait to some lichen species groupings to improve the ecological interpretation. The proposed adaptations were tested and showed an improvement in the acidophilous species proportion (from −94 to −13%) and functional diversity (from −21 to −4%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ecological Indicators is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:[Display omitted] • Ecological metrics and interpretation were biased by the sampling effort reduction. • Lichens GO underestimated the lichen richness and acidophilous species proportion. • An increase of the distance between trees can extend the sampling site availability. • We suggested a series of adaptations for the Lichens GO identification key. • Response on acidophilous species proportion and functional diversity were improved. The Lichens GO program is a French citizen science initiative based on the European guidelines that aims to evaluate the lichen diversity for urban air quality monitoring. In this study, we assessed the performance and applicability of the current Lichens GO protocol to then propose adaptations to make it more reliable and feasible for citizen science. To achieve this goal, we considered four aspects of the citizen science program: potential protocol simplifications, sampling site availability, observer bias, and volunteer feedbacks. Simulated simplification scenarios from a reference data set highlighted the large influence of reducing the number of sampled trees on taxonomic and functional structure metrics compared to reducing the number of sampled tree exposure sides and considered lichen species list. When considering the Lichens GO protocol (i.e., three trees, four exposure sides, Lichens GO species list) compared to the reference data set (i.e., five trees, four exposure sides, exhaustive species list), we evaluated an underestimation of lichen species richness (−25%), acidophilous species proportion (−94%), and functional diversity (−21%). In parallel, the maximum distance between sampled trees did not influence the taxonomic and functional structure metrics when considering a homogeneous sampling area (i.e., similar light or shade conditions). Finally, we compared Lichens GO relevés from 25 volunteers in the same site to highlight the major identification difficulties that could compromise the ecological interpretation. To improve the quality of data collected by citizens without increasing the sampling effort, we suggest to: (1) increase the maximum distance between trees from 10 to 50 m to extend the sampling site availability; (2) adapt the Lichens GO identification key to limit species confusion; and (3) assign an ecological trait to some lichen species groupings to improve the ecological interpretation. The proposed adaptations were tested and showed an improvement in the acidophilous species proportion (from −94 to −13%) and functional diversity (from −21 to −4%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:1470160X
DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110269