Accuracy of tumor size measurement in breast cancer using MRI is influenced by histological regression induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Accuracy of tumor size measurement in breast cancer using MRI is influenced by histological regression induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Authors: Wasser, K.1,2 klaus.wasser@rad.ma.uni-heidelberg.de, Sinn, H. P.3, Fink, C.1, Klein, S. K.1, Junkermann, H.4, Lüdemann, H. P.5, Zuna, I.1, Delorme, S.1, Lüdemann, H P (AUTHOR)
Source: European Radiology. Jun2003, Vol. 13 Issue 6, p1213-1223. 11p.
Subjects: Breast cancer, Magnetic resonance imaging, Diagnostic imaging, Cancer, Tumors, Adjuvant treatment of cancer, Drug therapy, Therapeutics, Antineoplastic agents, Breast, Breast tumors, Combined modality therapy, Paclitaxel, Disease remission, Contrast media, Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin
Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether regressive changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer affect the accuracy of preoperative MRI measurements of tumor size. Thirty-one patients with breast cancer underwent MRI before and after neoadjuvant treatment. Besides pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted MRI, dynamic MRI with high temporal resolution (turbo-FLASH) was performed. Contrast enhancement in dynamic MRI was quantified using a pharmacokinetic two-compartment model, where two parameters, amplitude and k(ep), were calculated and color coded on transversal parameter maps. Considering the conventional MR images, tumor diameters were measured on the color maps and compared with histological tumor size. Histological regression was scored on a five-point scale regarding cytopathic effects, reactive changes, and tumor cell reduction. The correlation between tumor sizes measured by MRI and histopathology was 0.83 ( p<0.0007) in 12 tumors without regressive changes (score 0), and 0.48 ( p<0.051) in 17 tumors with regressive changes scored 1 or 2, without any tendency for systematic over- or underestimation. In two cases without residual tumor (score 4), MRI likewise showed no signs of persistent tumor. The decrease of the contrast enhancement parameters was significantly more marked in tumors with signs of histological regression than in those without. Whenever MRI is used to judge the response of breast cancer to chemotherapy, the reader must be aware that therapy-induced changes may cause significant over- or underestimation of tumor size. We saw a high precision only when there was either no response - according to histological criteria - or when the tumor had regressed completely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:The aim of this study was to evaluate whether regressive changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer affect the accuracy of preoperative MRI measurements of tumor size. Thirty-one patients with breast cancer underwent MRI before and after neoadjuvant treatment. Besides pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted MRI, dynamic MRI with high temporal resolution (turbo-FLASH) was performed. Contrast enhancement in dynamic MRI was quantified using a pharmacokinetic two-compartment model, where two parameters, amplitude and k(ep), were calculated and color coded on transversal parameter maps. Considering the conventional MR images, tumor diameters were measured on the color maps and compared with histological tumor size. Histological regression was scored on a five-point scale regarding cytopathic effects, reactive changes, and tumor cell reduction. The correlation between tumor sizes measured by MRI and histopathology was 0.83 ( p<0.0007) in 12 tumors without regressive changes (score 0), and 0.48 ( p<0.051) in 17 tumors with regressive changes scored 1 or 2, without any tendency for systematic over- or underestimation. In two cases without residual tumor (score 4), MRI likewise showed no signs of persistent tumor. The decrease of the contrast enhancement parameters was significantly more marked in tumors with signs of histological regression than in those without. Whenever MRI is used to judge the response of breast cancer to chemotherapy, the reader must be aware that therapy-induced changes may cause significant over- or underestimation of tumor size. We saw a high precision only when there was either no response - according to histological criteria - or when the tumor had regressed completely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09387994
DOI:10.1007/s00330-002-1730-6