View in EDS

Efficient firms are all alike, but every inefficient firm is such in its own way: Heterogeneity of costs determinants in the Italian water sector.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Efficient firms are all alike, but every inefficient firm is such in its own way: Heterogeneity of costs determinants in the Italian water sector.
Authors: Massarutto, Antonio1 (AUTHOR) antonio.massarutto@uniud.it, Grassetti, Luca1 (AUTHOR), Lambardi di San Miniato, Michele1 (AUTHOR), Moletta, Mattia1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Utilities Policy. Oct2023, Vol. 84, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subjects: Data envelopment analysis, Heterogeneity, Sanitation, Water utilities, Business size
Abstract: The Italian water and sanitation services regulator, ARERA, has adopted a parametric model for assessing operators' efficiency and set efficiency improvement targets accordingly. This approach is based on a Stochastic Frontier Approach; deviations of actual costs from the estimated standard cost are interpreted as signals of inefficiency and determine how demanding the efficiency improvement target will be in the next regulatory period. We critically assess the approach adopted by ARERA, exploiting an original dataset fed by the original data of regulatory accounts that water operators transmit to ARERA for biennial tariff reviews. This data is not publicly available and represents a novel contribution since it allows statistically significant estimates (more than 200 observations) from a detailed breakdown of information concerning costs and performance levels. Our analysis applies various alternative estimation models, completing the more traditional SFA based on the Pitt-Lee approach adopted by ARERA, with more sophisticated models aimed at overcoming the problems caused by multicollinearity and data heterogeneity. Finally, we estimate a non-parametric model based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This comparison leads to some surprising results: different models generate similar overall results, but the resulting ranking is different, and the explanatory potential is limited to dimensional variables, while quality indicators and contextual elements seem more challenging to capture. We conclude that parametric models still seem far from the possibility of supporting the regulatory process, primarily when the industry is characterised by high heterogeneity of company size and operational environments. At the same time, the DEA is a promising, more flexible, and informative approach, but still unable to support regulatory decisions. • We exploit an original and unique dataset based on regulatory accounts of water companies. • We estimate multiple models, either parametric and non parametric. • We use innovative techniques for coping with data heterogeneity and multicollinearity. • We discuss critically the approach to efficiency benchmarking applied by the Italian regulatory authority. • We demonstrate that alternative estimation techniques may lead to rather different results in terms of efficiency valuation and ranking. • We criticize the use of stochastic frontiers for assessing utilities' efficiency when variability of observation is high. • We criticize the approach adopted by the Italian regulator and raise doubts about the use of SFA for regulatory purposes, especially when heterogeneity is high. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Utilities Policy is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:The Italian water and sanitation services regulator, ARERA, has adopted a parametric model for assessing operators' efficiency and set efficiency improvement targets accordingly. This approach is based on a Stochastic Frontier Approach; deviations of actual costs from the estimated standard cost are interpreted as signals of inefficiency and determine how demanding the efficiency improvement target will be in the next regulatory period. We critically assess the approach adopted by ARERA, exploiting an original dataset fed by the original data of regulatory accounts that water operators transmit to ARERA for biennial tariff reviews. This data is not publicly available and represents a novel contribution since it allows statistically significant estimates (more than 200 observations) from a detailed breakdown of information concerning costs and performance levels. Our analysis applies various alternative estimation models, completing the more traditional SFA based on the Pitt-Lee approach adopted by ARERA, with more sophisticated models aimed at overcoming the problems caused by multicollinearity and data heterogeneity. Finally, we estimate a non-parametric model based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This comparison leads to some surprising results: different models generate similar overall results, but the resulting ranking is different, and the explanatory potential is limited to dimensional variables, while quality indicators and contextual elements seem more challenging to capture. We conclude that parametric models still seem far from the possibility of supporting the regulatory process, primarily when the industry is characterised by high heterogeneity of company size and operational environments. At the same time, the DEA is a promising, more flexible, and informative approach, but still unable to support regulatory decisions. • We exploit an original and unique dataset based on regulatory accounts of water companies. • We estimate multiple models, either parametric and non parametric. • We use innovative techniques for coping with data heterogeneity and multicollinearity. • We discuss critically the approach to efficiency benchmarking applied by the Italian regulatory authority. • We demonstrate that alternative estimation techniques may lead to rather different results in terms of efficiency valuation and ranking. • We criticize the use of stochastic frontiers for assessing utilities' efficiency when variability of observation is high. • We criticize the approach adopted by the Italian regulator and raise doubts about the use of SFA for regulatory purposes, especially when heterogeneity is high. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09571787
DOI:10.1016/j.jup.2023.101646