View in EDS

Unraveling the factors influencing CO2 emissions from hydroelectric reservoirs in karst and non-karst regions: A comparative analysis.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Unraveling the factors influencing CO2 emissions from hydroelectric reservoirs in karst and non-karst regions: A comparative analysis.
Authors: Wang, Wanfa1,2 (AUTHOR), Li, Si-Liang1,3 (AUTHOR) siliang.li@tju.edu.cn, Zhong, Jun3 (AUTHOR), Yi, Yuanbi4 (AUTHOR), Yue, Fujun3 (AUTHOR), Han, Zenglei5 (AUTHOR), Wu, Qixin1,2 (AUTHOR), He, Ding4 (AUTHOR), Liu, Cong-Qiang3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Water Research. Jan2024, Vol. 248, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subjects: Carbon emissions, Karst, Geologic hot spots, Carbonate minerals, Water chemistry, Cap rock, Partial pressure, Water salinization
Geographic Terms: China
Abstract: • Carbon transport and transformation varies in two reservoirs with different geological settings. • Karst reservoirs exhibit a higher Revelle factor (RF) and low CO 2 emissions. • Attention should be paid to the high CO 2 emission effect of non-karst reservoirs. • Consider geological settings when estimating the global budget for reservoir CO 2 emissions. Carbon migration, transformation, and emissions as CO 2 in reservoir and lake systems have been extensively studied. However, uncertainties persist regarding carbon cycling variations in both karst and non-karst regions within large thermal stratified river-reservoir systems. To address this knowledge gap, we combined measurements of water chemistry, isotopic compositions (δ13C), partial pressure of CO 2 (p CO 2), and CO 2 fluxes (F CO2) to elucidate the differences, control mechanisms, and environmental effects of various carbon biogeochemical processes in the Hongjiadu reservoir (HJD, karst reservoir) and Shangyoujiang reservoir (SYJ, non-karst reservoir), Yangtze River basin, China. Our results demonstrate that key biogeochemical processes are associated with CO 2 production and emissions. The stronger biological carbon pump (BCP) effect in the lentic area of the HJD reservoir limited CO 2 emission (0.9 ± 5.0 mmol m−2 d−1) compared to the SYJ reservoir (50.9 ± 33.4 mmol m−2 d−1), leading to low dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and high saturation state of carbonate minerals in the lentic epilimnion. Although the released water from both reservoirs acted as hotspots for CO 2 emissions, the results of higher Revelle factor (RF) in the HJD reservoir than SYJ reservoir suggest the greater buffer capacity and lower sensitivity of OC degradation changes in DIC. Despite the shorter hydraulic retention time (HRT) of SYJ reservoir (120 d) compared to HJD reservoir (368 d), F CO2 was 3.5 times higher than that of the HJD reservoir (652.9 mmol m−2 d−1). Moreover, upon analyzing selected reservoirs worldwide, it becomes apparent that karst reservoirs demonstrate a reduced potential for CO 2 emissions. Our results indicate that the impact of varying geologic settings should be considered to minimize errors in regional and global CO 2 emission estimates. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Water Research is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:• Carbon transport and transformation varies in two reservoirs with different geological settings. • Karst reservoirs exhibit a higher Revelle factor (RF) and low CO 2 emissions. • Attention should be paid to the high CO 2 emission effect of non-karst reservoirs. • Consider geological settings when estimating the global budget for reservoir CO 2 emissions. Carbon migration, transformation, and emissions as CO 2 in reservoir and lake systems have been extensively studied. However, uncertainties persist regarding carbon cycling variations in both karst and non-karst regions within large thermal stratified river-reservoir systems. To address this knowledge gap, we combined measurements of water chemistry, isotopic compositions (δ13C), partial pressure of CO 2 (p CO 2), and CO 2 fluxes (F CO2) to elucidate the differences, control mechanisms, and environmental effects of various carbon biogeochemical processes in the Hongjiadu reservoir (HJD, karst reservoir) and Shangyoujiang reservoir (SYJ, non-karst reservoir), Yangtze River basin, China. Our results demonstrate that key biogeochemical processes are associated with CO 2 production and emissions. The stronger biological carbon pump (BCP) effect in the lentic area of the HJD reservoir limited CO 2 emission (0.9 ± 5.0 mmol m−2 d−1) compared to the SYJ reservoir (50.9 ± 33.4 mmol m−2 d−1), leading to low dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and high saturation state of carbonate minerals in the lentic epilimnion. Although the released water from both reservoirs acted as hotspots for CO 2 emissions, the results of higher Revelle factor (RF) in the HJD reservoir than SYJ reservoir suggest the greater buffer capacity and lower sensitivity of OC degradation changes in DIC. Despite the shorter hydraulic retention time (HRT) of SYJ reservoir (120 d) compared to HJD reservoir (368 d), F CO2 was 3.5 times higher than that of the HJD reservoir (652.9 mmol m−2 d−1). Moreover, upon analyzing selected reservoirs worldwide, it becomes apparent that karst reservoirs demonstrate a reduced potential for CO 2 emissions. Our results indicate that the impact of varying geologic settings should be considered to minimize errors in regional and global CO 2 emission estimates. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00431354
DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2023.120893