View in EDS

Interactive and Multimetric Robustness Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Interactive and Multimetric Robustness Tradeoffs in the Colorado River Basin.
Authors: Bonham, Nathan1 (AUTHOR) nathan.bonham@colorado.edu, Kasprzyk, Joseph2 (AUTHOR), Zagona, Edith3 (AUTHOR), Smith, Rebecca4 (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning & Management. Mar2024, Vol. 150 Issue 3, p1-12. 12p.
Subjects: Watersheds, Web-based user interfaces, Environmental policy, Data visualization, Scarcity
Abstract: Policies for environmental systems are being increasingly evaluated on their robustness to deeply uncertain future scenarios. There exist many metrics to quantify robustness, the choice of which depends on stakeholder preferences such as performance thresholds and risk tolerance. Importantly, the policy deemed most robust can vary depending on which metrics are used. Complex systems often result in incomplete or inaccurate understanding of what the performance outcomes of a decision are, meaning that policies selected from initial robustness preferences can result in unexpected trade-offs between performance objectives and exhibit alarmingly poor robustness under alternative metrics. Therefore, we propose a novel, a posteriori robustness framework. Our framework calculates a broad selection of robustness metrics that reflect varying degrees of risk-tolerance and use different methods to summarize performance over future scenarios. Then, we provide stakeholders with background information to interpret what the metrics indicate, rather than propose what metrics are most appropriate based on their initial preferences. We use interactive visualization tools to explore trade-offs between many robustness metrics and performance objectives, iteratively refine what metrics and objectives are important, and remove nonrobust policies. Our dynamic and interactive framework requires an integrated platform, which we create through a web application. We apply our framework to a case study of Lake Mead shortage policies in the Colorado River Basin. Our results show that the selection of Lake Mead policies from predetermined performance requirements and a single type of robustness metric, as done in previous studies, yields solutions with severe but unexpected shortages. Building on these studies, we use our framework to discover these trade-offs, build a multiobjective and multimetric definition of robustness, and choose four robust alternatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Water Resources Planning & Management is the property of American Society of Civil Engineers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Policies for environmental systems are being increasingly evaluated on their robustness to deeply uncertain future scenarios. There exist many metrics to quantify robustness, the choice of which depends on stakeholder preferences such as performance thresholds and risk tolerance. Importantly, the policy deemed most robust can vary depending on which metrics are used. Complex systems often result in incomplete or inaccurate understanding of what the performance outcomes of a decision are, meaning that policies selected from initial robustness preferences can result in unexpected trade-offs between performance objectives and exhibit alarmingly poor robustness under alternative metrics. Therefore, we propose a novel, a posteriori robustness framework. Our framework calculates a broad selection of robustness metrics that reflect varying degrees of risk-tolerance and use different methods to summarize performance over future scenarios. Then, we provide stakeholders with background information to interpret what the metrics indicate, rather than propose what metrics are most appropriate based on their initial preferences. We use interactive visualization tools to explore trade-offs between many robustness metrics and performance objectives, iteratively refine what metrics and objectives are important, and remove nonrobust policies. Our dynamic and interactive framework requires an integrated platform, which we create through a web application. We apply our framework to a case study of Lake Mead shortage policies in the Colorado River Basin. Our results show that the selection of Lake Mead policies from predetermined performance requirements and a single type of robustness metric, as done in previous studies, yields solutions with severe but unexpected shortages. Building on these studies, we use our framework to discover these trade-offs, build a multiobjective and multimetric definition of robustness, and choose four robust alternatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:07339496
DOI:10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6199