Human-centred AI in industry 5.0: a systematic review.
Saved in:
| Title: | Human-centred AI in industry 5.0: a systematic review. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Passalacqua, Mario1,2 (AUTHOR) mario.passalacqua@polymtl.ca, Pellerin, Robert1 (AUTHOR), Magnani, Florian3 (AUTHOR), Doyon-Poulin, Philippe1 (AUTHOR), Del-Aguila, Laurène4 (AUTHOR), Boasen, Jared4 (AUTHOR), Léger, Pierre-Majorique4 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | International Journal of Production Research. Apr2025, Vol. 63 Issue 7, p2638-2669. 32p. |
| Subjects: | Technological innovations, Psychosocial factors, Data integration, Industry 4.0, Trust |
| Abstract: | Industry 4.0 (I4.0) is a manufacturing paradigm revolutionising production by integrating advanced technologies, like AI, for automation and data integration. However, research in I4.0 overlooks human factors, crucial for designing systems that enhance well-being, trust, motivation, and performance. To address this, international bodies have introduced Industry 5.0, aiming to balance technological advancement with human welfare. To transition towards this vision, an understanding of current human-technology interaction is essential. Through a conceptual model aiming to understand the psychological experience of workers within their environment, we identified the studied human factors, their antecedents, consequences, and methodologies. Additionally, we explored how future research can adopt a human-centred approach in designing and implementing technology. Analysis of 67 articles showed the psychosocial dimension of human factors like AI trust, worker autonomy, motivation, and stress are underrepresented. We observed a significant disconnect between empirical and non-empirical studies in terms of theoretical frameworks, variable selection, data collection methods, and research designs. Our findings highlight the necessity for experimental, theory-driven research in human-AI interaction, using a multi-method approach including perceptual, observational, and psychophysiological measures. Lastly, we discuss the integration of these findings into managerial practice to foster workplaces that are technologically advanced yet remain empathetic to human needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of International Journal of Production Research is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Industry 4.0 (I4.0) is a manufacturing paradigm revolutionising production by integrating advanced technologies, like AI, for automation and data integration. However, research in I4.0 overlooks human factors, crucial for designing systems that enhance well-being, trust, motivation, and performance. To address this, international bodies have introduced Industry 5.0, aiming to balance technological advancement with human welfare. To transition towards this vision, an understanding of current human-technology interaction is essential. Through a conceptual model aiming to understand the psychological experience of workers within their environment, we identified the studied human factors, their antecedents, consequences, and methodologies. Additionally, we explored how future research can adopt a human-centred approach in designing and implementing technology. Analysis of 67 articles showed the psychosocial dimension of human factors like AI trust, worker autonomy, motivation, and stress are underrepresented. We observed a significant disconnect between empirical and non-empirical studies in terms of theoretical frameworks, variable selection, data collection methods, and research designs. Our findings highlight the necessity for experimental, theory-driven research in human-AI interaction, using a multi-method approach including perceptual, observational, and psychophysiological measures. Lastly, we discuss the integration of these findings into managerial practice to foster workplaces that are technologically advanced yet remain empathetic to human needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00207543 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/00207543.2024.2406021 |
