RETRACTED ARTICLE: Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Heterogenous Hybrid Nanocatalyst of Copper/Palladium MOF, RIT 62-Cu/Pd for Stille Polycondensation of Thieno[2,3-b]pyrrol-5-One Derivatives.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: RETRACTED ARTICLE: Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Heterogenous Hybrid Nanocatalyst of Copper/Palladium MOF, RIT 62-Cu/Pd for Stille Polycondensation of Thieno[2,3-b]pyrrol-5-One Derivatives.
Authors: Maya Pai, M.1 (AUTHOR) mayapai7@gmail.com, Yallur, Basappa C.2 (AUTHOR) yallurbc@gmail.com, Batakurki, Sheetal R.1 (AUTHOR) sheetalrb@gmail.com, Adimule, Vinayak3 (AUTHOR) adimulevinayak@yahoo.in
Source: Topics in Catalysis. Jul2025, Vol. 68 Issue 13, p1594-1594. 1p.
Subjects: Retraction of scholarly articles, Catalytic activity, Nanoparticles, Polycondensation, Palladium
Abstract: The article discusses the retraction of a review article due to a compromised initial peer review process, which was later found to lack a critical assessment of the relevant literature. Authors Vinayak Adimule, Sheetal Batakurki, and M. Maya Pai disagree with the retraction, while the remaining authors have not responded to the editor or publisher regarding this decision. The full text of the retracted article is available online as Supplementary Information. [Extracted from the article]
Copyright of Topics in Catalysis is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:The article discusses the retraction of a review article due to a compromised initial peer review process, which was later found to lack a critical assessment of the relevant literature. Authors Vinayak Adimule, Sheetal Batakurki, and M. Maya Pai disagree with the retraction, while the remaining authors have not responded to the editor or publisher regarding this decision. The full text of the retracted article is available online as Supplementary Information. [Extracted from the article]
ISSN:10225528
DOI:10.1007/s11244-022-01618-1