Thinking About Genre.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Thinking About Genre.
Authors: Galloway, Matthew1 mgalloway@anythinklibraries.org
Source: RUSQ: A Journal of Reference & User Experience. 2025, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p13-14. 2p.
Subjects: Libraries, Classification of books, Fiction genres, Literary form
Abstract: The article discusses the complexities of categorizing books by genre in libraries that do not use the Dewey Decimal System, instead opting for a combination of BISAC (Book Industry Standards and Communications) and simplified language. The author highlights the challenges that arise from differing perspectives on genre among publishers, the public, and libraries, using examples like "Remarkably Bright Creatures" and "Pony Confidential" to illustrate how marketing and public perception can influence genre classification. The piece emphasizes the need for libraries to consider how readers engage with genres and the importance of aligning library categorization with public expectations while acknowledging the increasing blending of genres. [Extracted from the article]
Copyright of RUSQ: A Journal of Reference & User Experience is the property of American Library Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:The article discusses the complexities of categorizing books by genre in libraries that do not use the Dewey Decimal System, instead opting for a combination of BISAC (Book Industry Standards and Communications) and simplified language. The author highlights the challenges that arise from differing perspectives on genre among publishers, the public, and libraries, using examples like "Remarkably Bright Creatures" and "Pony Confidential" to illustrate how marketing and public perception can influence genre classification. The piece emphasizes the need for libraries to consider how readers engage with genres and the importance of aligning library categorization with public expectations while acknowledging the increasing blending of genres. [Extracted from the article]