A Comparative Study on Drive Cycle Performance of Laboratory PMSMs Using Efficiency Maps and Time-Stepping Approaches.
Saved in:
| Title: | A Comparative Study on Drive Cycle Performance of Laboratory PMSMs Using Efficiency Maps and Time-Stepping Approaches. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Dhakal, Pawan Kumar1 (AUTHOR) pawan.dhakal@tugraz.at, Heidarikani, Kourosh1 (AUTHOR), Seebacher, Roland1 (AUTHOR), Muetze, Annette1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Energies (19961073). Nov2025, Vol. 18 Issue 21, p5802. 22p. |
| Subjects: | Permanent magnet motors, Transients (Dynamics), Finite element method, Torque measurements, Testing laboratories |
| Abstract: | Numerous studies have explored the performance of electric motors under various drive cycles, with many initially concentrating on steady-state analysis to generate efficiency maps mainly due to their simplicity and computational efficiency. However, this approach does not necessarily provide accurate insights and quantification of transient drive cycle performance, where the focus extends beyond a single steady-state operating point (OP) to the dynamic sequence of torque–speed points and the factors influencing this transient behavior. Indeed, there is only fragmented knowledge on how such transient cycles can be evaluated in smaller-scale laboratory settings. To address these gaps, this study evaluates grid-based efficiency maps against time-stepping measurements for a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) across diverse drive cycles, examining both total drive cycle energies and localized performance deviations. A laboratory-based PMSM is used as the reference system, with standardized drive cycles appropriately scaled for experimental validation. Steady-state efficiency maps are constructed using a combination of finite element analysis (FEA), analytical methods, and laboratory measurements, evaluated across multiple torque–speed grid resolutions. The motor's performance over different drive cycles, as estimated using these efficiency maps, is then evaluated and validated against direct time-stepping measurements obtained from experimental testing. A detailed quantification of the results from both study approaches is also presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Energies (19961073) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Numerous studies have explored the performance of electric motors under various drive cycles, with many initially concentrating on steady-state analysis to generate efficiency maps mainly due to their simplicity and computational efficiency. However, this approach does not necessarily provide accurate insights and quantification of transient drive cycle performance, where the focus extends beyond a single steady-state operating point (OP) to the dynamic sequence of torque–speed points and the factors influencing this transient behavior. Indeed, there is only fragmented knowledge on how such transient cycles can be evaluated in smaller-scale laboratory settings. To address these gaps, this study evaluates grid-based efficiency maps against time-stepping measurements for a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) across diverse drive cycles, examining both total drive cycle energies and localized performance deviations. A laboratory-based PMSM is used as the reference system, with standardized drive cycles appropriately scaled for experimental validation. Steady-state efficiency maps are constructed using a combination of finite element analysis (FEA), analytical methods, and laboratory measurements, evaluated across multiple torque–speed grid resolutions. The motor's performance over different drive cycles, as estimated using these efficiency maps, is then evaluated and validated against direct time-stepping measurements obtained from experimental testing. A detailed quantification of the results from both study approaches is also presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 19961073 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/en18215802 |
