View in EDS

Demonstration of integrated lunar water extraction and capturing system: overview of results from the LUWEX project.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Demonstration of integrated lunar water extraction and capturing system: overview of results from the LUWEX project.
Authors: Kiewiet, Luca1 (AUTHOR) luca.kiewiet@dlr.de, Fälker, Svenja1 (AUTHOR) svenja.faelker@dlr.de, López, Mateo Rejón1 (AUTHOR) mateo.rejonlopez@dlr.de, Zabel, Paul1 (AUTHOR) paul.zabel@dlr.de
Source: Advances in Space Research. Mar2026, Vol. 77 Issue 5, p6368-6389. 22p.
Subjects: Extraction techniques, Extraterrestrial resources, Energy consumption, Lunar soil, Phase transitions, Methanol
Abstract: • An integrated crucible-based thermal extraction, cold-trap capturing, and liquefaction system is experimentally demonstrated, processing up to 13 kg of icy simulant under PSR-relevant thermal–vacuum conditions. • The end-to-end system recovers about 50–70% of the initial water (with a maximum of ∼73%) and achieves recovery energy efficiencies up to 66 g/kWh for icy glass beads and 23 g/kWh for icy lunar regolith simulant. • Experimental results indicate that vapour capture capacity, rather than extraction power, is the dominant bottleneck in the LUWEX design. Increasing heater power without upsizing the cold trap mainly increases losses instead of recovered water. • Approximately 1 wt% methanol is deliberately added to the icy simulant as a representative volatile contaminant, and condensed methanol films on the cold trap are observed to markedly suppress water–ice deposition and recovery. Sustainable lunar exploration requires efficient in-situ resource utilisation, particularly for water extraction to enable life support and propellant production. The LUWEX project addressed this need by experimentally demonstrating the functionality of an integrated thermal water extraction and capturing system under simulated lunar polar conditions. In a series of tests in a vacuum chamber, a crucible-based heating system with integrated stirring capability was used to sublimate water from icy regolith simulants (up to 13 kg per run, containing 5 wt% of ice in the simulant material). The vapour was deposited on a cryogenic cold trap before liquefaction. Various operational scenarios were examined, including different simulant types, the use of mechanical stirring, and the introduction of contaminants (e.g. methanol) to evaluate their effects on performance. Key findings show that the end-to-end process is feasible at a multi-kilogram scale in a lunar polar crater-like environment, achieving significant water recovery, with over half of the sample's water recovered, peaking at ∼73%. Energy-wise, recovery energy efficiency reached 66.33 g/kWh for the icy glass beads simulant and 22.88 g/kWh for the icy regolith simulant experiments. The resulting average water recovery rate corresponds from 2.06 g/h to up to 7.76 g/h (which corresponds to 0.05–0.19 kg/day) in the best-performing run. These values reflect the energy required to recover water and maintain operational temperatures within a permanently shaded region on the Moon. However, dust generation impaired seal integrity and camera visibility. Trace volatiles, such as methanol, markedly reduced capture efficiency by forming a liquid barrier on the capturing device. Nonetheless, these results demonstrate the viability of large-scale lunar water extraction with an integrated system. Critical challenges such as dust mitigation, vapour capture capacity, and contaminant management remain to be solved. The insights gained are relevant to designing robust ISRU water extraction units for future lunar missions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Advances in Space Research is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:• An integrated crucible-based thermal extraction, cold-trap capturing, and liquefaction system is experimentally demonstrated, processing up to 13 kg of icy simulant under PSR-relevant thermal–vacuum conditions. • The end-to-end system recovers about 50–70% of the initial water (with a maximum of ∼73%) and achieves recovery energy efficiencies up to 66 g/kWh for icy glass beads and 23 g/kWh for icy lunar regolith simulant. • Experimental results indicate that vapour capture capacity, rather than extraction power, is the dominant bottleneck in the LUWEX design. Increasing heater power without upsizing the cold trap mainly increases losses instead of recovered water. • Approximately 1 wt% methanol is deliberately added to the icy simulant as a representative volatile contaminant, and condensed methanol films on the cold trap are observed to markedly suppress water–ice deposition and recovery. Sustainable lunar exploration requires efficient in-situ resource utilisation, particularly for water extraction to enable life support and propellant production. The LUWEX project addressed this need by experimentally demonstrating the functionality of an integrated thermal water extraction and capturing system under simulated lunar polar conditions. In a series of tests in a vacuum chamber, a crucible-based heating system with integrated stirring capability was used to sublimate water from icy regolith simulants (up to 13 kg per run, containing 5 wt% of ice in the simulant material). The vapour was deposited on a cryogenic cold trap before liquefaction. Various operational scenarios were examined, including different simulant types, the use of mechanical stirring, and the introduction of contaminants (e.g. methanol) to evaluate their effects on performance. Key findings show that the end-to-end process is feasible at a multi-kilogram scale in a lunar polar crater-like environment, achieving significant water recovery, with over half of the sample's water recovered, peaking at ∼73%. Energy-wise, recovery energy efficiency reached 66.33 g/kWh for the icy glass beads simulant and 22.88 g/kWh for the icy regolith simulant experiments. The resulting average water recovery rate corresponds from 2.06 g/h to up to 7.76 g/h (which corresponds to 0.05–0.19 kg/day) in the best-performing run. These values reflect the energy required to recover water and maintain operational temperatures within a permanently shaded region on the Moon. However, dust generation impaired seal integrity and camera visibility. Trace volatiles, such as methanol, markedly reduced capture efficiency by forming a liquid barrier on the capturing device. Nonetheless, these results demonstrate the viability of large-scale lunar water extraction with an integrated system. Critical challenges such as dust mitigation, vapour capture capacity, and contaminant management remain to be solved. The insights gained are relevant to designing robust ISRU water extraction units for future lunar missions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:02731177
DOI:10.1016/j.asr.2026.01.041