EVALUATION OF REFRIGERANT OIL SEPARATORS FOR SCREW CHILLER.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	EVALUATION OF REFRIGERANT OIL SEPARATORS FOR SCREW CHILLER.
Authors:	MAJGAONKAR, Amey S.^1,2 amey.majgaonkar@kirloskar.com, KARTHIKEYAN, A.¹, BHOJWANI, Virendra K.³
Source:	Thermal Science. 2026, Vol. 30 Issue 1B, p509-519. 11p.
Subjects:	Oil separators, Refrigeration & refrigerating machinery, Computational fluid dynamics, Pressure drop (Fluid dynamics), Cooling systems, Separation (Technology), Particle size distribution
Abstract:	Effective refrigerant and oil separation is must for reliable and energy efficient chiller operation. Type A is a conventional oil separator design having a larger shell diameter and single refrigerant outlet connected to condenser using a discharge piping. Type B is novel oil separator design having a smaller shell diameter and two refrigerant outlets connected to the condenser. The CFD simulation of both designs is done for comparing oil separation efficiencies, velocity distribution, pressure drop and oil droplet trajectories. The simulated pressure drop matches closely (< 5%) with experimental results in both designs. Type A design has higher (10912 Pa) pressure drop than Type B design. Simulation shows both the designs have almost equivalent oil separation efficiency at and above 25 µm oil droplet sizes. Below 25 µm oil droplet sizes, the Type B design has better oil separation efficiency. Chiller with Type B design has better oil circulation rates in liquid refrigerant than the chiller with Type A design at maximum flow rate condition. Therefore, Type B oil separator is found to be superior in performance (lower pressure drop and lower oil circulation rates) at lesser cost. Chiller with Type B oil separator is having 0.5% more refrigeration capacity, 1.6% higher COP and 1.1% lower power consumption than chiller with Type A oil separator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Thermal Science is the property of Society of Thermal Engineers of Serbia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Engineering Source

Description
Abstract:	Effective refrigerant and oil separation is must for reliable and energy efficient chiller operation. Type A is a conventional oil separator design having a larger shell diameter and single refrigerant outlet connected to condenser using a discharge piping. Type B is novel oil separator design having a smaller shell diameter and two refrigerant outlets connected to the condenser. The CFD simulation of both designs is done for comparing oil separation efficiencies, velocity distribution, pressure drop and oil droplet trajectories. The simulated pressure drop matches closely (< 5%) with experimental results in both designs. Type A design has higher (10912 Pa) pressure drop than Type B design. Simulation shows both the designs have almost equivalent oil separation efficiency at and above 25 µm oil droplet sizes. Below 25 µm oil droplet sizes, the Type B design has better oil separation efficiency. Chiller with Type B design has better oil circulation rates in liquid refrigerant than the chiller with Type A design at maximum flow rate condition. Therefore, Type B oil separator is found to be superior in performance (lower pressure drop and lower oil circulation rates) at lesser cost. Chiller with Type B oil separator is having 0.5% more refrigeration capacity, 1.6% higher COP and 1.1% lower power consumption than chiller with Type A oil separator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	03549836
DOI:	10.2298/TSCI250122100M