Polycarbonate Nanocomposites for Application in X-Ray Shielding: Reducing X-Ray Hazards from Dental Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging in Dental Patients.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Polycarbonate Nanocomposites for Application in X-Ray Shielding: Reducing X-Ray Hazards from Dental Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging in Dental Patients.
Authors: Nouh, Abdallah S.1 (AUTHOR), More, Chaitali V.2,3 (AUTHOR), Benthami, Kaoutar A.4 (AUTHOR), Barakat, Mai M.E5,6 (AUTHOR), Nouh, Samir A.7,8 (AUTHOR) samin273@gmail.com
Source: Journal of Macromolecular Science: Physics. 2026, Vol. 65 Issue 6, p964-974. 11p.
Subjects: Polymeric nanocomposites, Copper oxide, Mass attenuation coefficients, Radiation protection, Cone beam computed tomography, Polymeric composites
Abstract: Despite its several benefits, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has a significant drawback in terms of the exposure dose required for its diagnostic assessment. The theoretical calculations showed that the risks associated with using CBCT can be evaded by designing effective shielding. Polycarbonate/copper oxide nanocomposites (PC/CuO NCs) that contain carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) or polyethylene oxide (PEO) polymers, or polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) polymer can be effective alternatives to the X-ray shielding materials which are based on toxic lead. The mass attenuation coefficient (MAC) and linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) were calculated for the PC/PMMA/CuO, PC/CMC/CuO, PC/PBT/CuO and PC/PEO/Cuo polymer NCs using the Phy-X/PSD program. The half value layer (HVL) and tenth value layer (TVL) were then calculated using the attenuation coefficients. Additionally, the mean free path (MFP) of the examined samples was calculated. To cover a wide range of energy that interacts with the investigated substances, all of these shielding characteristics were computed for the X-ray incidence energy range between 0.015 and 15 MeV. When compared to PC/PMMA/CuO, PC/PBT/CuO, and PC/PEO/CuO polymer NCs, the results showed that the PC/CMC/CuO polymer NCs had the superior X-ray shielding qualities. As a result, we came to the conclusion that the PC/CMC/CuO polymer NC would be a suitable candidate for X-ray shielding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Macromolecular Science: Physics is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Despite its several benefits, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has a significant drawback in terms of the exposure dose required for its diagnostic assessment. The theoretical calculations showed that the risks associated with using CBCT can be evaded by designing effective shielding. Polycarbonate/copper oxide nanocomposites (PC/CuO NCs) that contain carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) or polyethylene oxide (PEO) polymers, or polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) polymer can be effective alternatives to the X-ray shielding materials which are based on toxic lead. The mass attenuation coefficient (MAC) and linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) were calculated for the PC/PMMA/CuO, PC/CMC/CuO, PC/PBT/CuO and PC/PEO/Cuo polymer NCs using the Phy-X/PSD program. The half value layer (HVL) and tenth value layer (TVL) were then calculated using the attenuation coefficients. Additionally, the mean free path (MFP) of the examined samples was calculated. To cover a wide range of energy that interacts with the investigated substances, all of these shielding characteristics were computed for the X-ray incidence energy range between 0.015 and 15 MeV. When compared to PC/PMMA/CuO, PC/PBT/CuO, and PC/PEO/CuO polymer NCs, the results showed that the PC/CMC/CuO polymer NCs had the superior X-ray shielding qualities. As a result, we came to the conclusion that the PC/CMC/CuO polymer NC would be a suitable candidate for X-ray shielding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00222348
DOI:10.1080/00222348.2025.2483032