Strength Prediction Models for Concrete Incorporating Fly Ash as a Waste Material.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Strength Prediction Models for Concrete Incorporating Fly Ash as a Waste Material.
Authors: Kumar, M.1 (AUTHOR) madan123kumar@gmail.com, Kumar, V.2 (AUTHOR) kumar2vijay@gmail.com, Priyadarshee, A.2 (AUTHOR) i.akashpriyadarshee1@gmail.com, Kumar Rahul, A.2 (AUTHOR) atulcivil.iitbhu@gmail.com, Kumar, R.3 (AUTHOR) ampuravi@gmail.com, Kumari, Shweta4 (AUTHOR) shweta@mitmuzaffarpur.org
Source: Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences. May2026, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p47-56. 10p.
Subjects: Machine learning, Boosting algorithms, Random forest algorithms, Compressive strength, Concrete, Multiple regression analysis, Support vector machines
Abstract: A comparative machine learning–based methodology was adopted to predict the compressive strength of fly ash concrete using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), AdaBoost Regressor (ABR), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting models (XG). A dataset of 498 mix designs collected from published literature was used, considering cement, fine and coarse aggregate, fly ash content, water content, water–cement ratio, and curing period as input parameters. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error, root mean square error, and coefficient of determination. The Extreme Gradient Boosting model showed the best predictive capability (R² = 0.881; RMSE = 5.65 MPa). Sensitivity analysis identified curing period, cement content, and water content as the most influential variables. The results demonstrate reliable strength prediction and enable model comparison to support data-driven mix optimization for sustainable fly ash concrete (FAC). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences is the property of Paradigm Publishing Services and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:A comparative machine learning–based methodology was adopted to predict the compressive strength of fly ash concrete using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), AdaBoost Regressor (ABR), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting models (XG). A dataset of 498 mix designs collected from published literature was used, considering cement, fine and coarse aggregate, fly ash content, water content, water–cement ratio, and curing period as input parameters. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error, root mean square error, and coefficient of determination. The Extreme Gradient Boosting model showed the best predictive capability (R² = 0.881; RMSE = 5.65 MPa). Sensitivity analysis identified curing period, cement content, and water content as the most influential variables. The results demonstrate reliable strength prediction and enable model comparison to support data-driven mix optimization for sustainable fly ash concrete (FAC). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:22473769
DOI:10.2478/jaes-2026-0007