Sanding in Sliding Sleeve Completed Wells Without Sand Control in Moderately Competent Sand-Prone Reservoir Formations: A Field Case.
Saved in:
| Title: | Sanding in Sliding Sleeve Completed Wells Without Sand Control in Moderately Competent Sand-Prone Reservoir Formations: A Field Case. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Xiao, Yuxing1 (AUTHOR) Yuxing.Xiao@bp.com, Agrawal, Madhusuden1 (AUTHOR), Vaziri, Hans1 (AUTHOR), Anthony, Rosemary2 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering. May2026, Vol. 59 Issue 5, p5639-5647. 9p. |
| Subjects: | Petroleum reservoirs, Production methods in oil fields, Granular flow, Fluid flow |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom |
| Abstract: | A field case is described to show the first application of a sliding sleeve sandface completion without sand control in a moderately competent sand-prone reservoir formation. This type of sandface completion consists of blank pipe segments, isolation packers, and sleeves in between serving as flow ports. This geometrical configuration renders a unique sanding mechanism. Due to a large opening in the annulus, the rock starts to disaggregate at a low reservoir pressure depletion, but its aggregates tend to be blocky and thus favorable in lowering sanding risk as bigger aggregates have a higher frictional resistance and require a higher fluid velocity to transport. Also, annular fluid flow is accumulative, and its velocity is zero at the packer and the highest at the sleeve. An effective practical measure to lower sanding risk, therefore, is to optimize the number and locations of packers and sleeves in relation to reservoir formation strength and sandface flow contributions. The sanding mechanism and practical ramifications are illustrated through historical sanding responses in 11 wells in an oil field in the UK North Sea. Most wells have experienced watercut and the flowrate in some wells is high. Sanding to date, however, is below the design tolerance. A method was developed to estimate the annular fluid velocity. Through cross-referencing historical sanding responses within the sanding mechanism framework, empirical relationships between sand mass per meter length and annular fluid velocity were established to help optimize sandface completion design in future wells and production and interventions in existing wells. Highlights: The sliding sleeve sandface completion renders a unique sanding mechanism due to its geometrical configuration. Rock disaggregates favorably in the annulus due to its large geometrical opening while the flow is cumulative and its velocity is the highest at the sleeve's flow ports. The number and locations of packers and sleeve can be optimized to regulate the annular fluid flow velocity to mitigate sanding risk. The empirical sanding severity vs. annular fluid flow velocity relations based on production histories in 11 wells are useful for optimizing new well's sandface completion design and existing well's production and interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | A field case is described to show the first application of a sliding sleeve sandface completion without sand control in a moderately competent sand-prone reservoir formation. This type of sandface completion consists of blank pipe segments, isolation packers, and sleeves in between serving as flow ports. This geometrical configuration renders a unique sanding mechanism. Due to a large opening in the annulus, the rock starts to disaggregate at a low reservoir pressure depletion, but its aggregates tend to be blocky and thus favorable in lowering sanding risk as bigger aggregates have a higher frictional resistance and require a higher fluid velocity to transport. Also, annular fluid flow is accumulative, and its velocity is zero at the packer and the highest at the sleeve. An effective practical measure to lower sanding risk, therefore, is to optimize the number and locations of packers and sleeves in relation to reservoir formation strength and sandface flow contributions. The sanding mechanism and practical ramifications are illustrated through historical sanding responses in 11 wells in an oil field in the UK North Sea. Most wells have experienced watercut and the flowrate in some wells is high. Sanding to date, however, is below the design tolerance. A method was developed to estimate the annular fluid velocity. Through cross-referencing historical sanding responses within the sanding mechanism framework, empirical relationships between sand mass per meter length and annular fluid velocity were established to help optimize sandface completion design in future wells and production and interventions in existing wells. Highlights: The sliding sleeve sandface completion renders a unique sanding mechanism due to its geometrical configuration. Rock disaggregates favorably in the annulus due to its large geometrical opening while the flow is cumulative and its velocity is the highest at the sleeve's flow ports. The number and locations of packers and sleeve can be optimized to regulate the annular fluid flow velocity to mitigate sanding risk. The empirical sanding severity vs. annular fluid flow velocity relations based on production histories in 11 wells are useful for optimizing new well's sandface completion design and existing well's production and interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 07232632 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00603-024-03984-6 |
