Optimization of transfer learning for facial emotion classification on the FER-2013 dataset.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Optimization of transfer learning for facial emotion classification on the FER-2013 dataset.
Authors:	Barkah, Nida Muhliya¹ nidamuhliya35@gmail.com, 'Uyun, Shofwatul¹ shofwatul.uyun@uin-suka.ac.id
Source:	International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering (2088-8708). Jun2026, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p1213-1226. 14p.
Subjects:	Emotion recognition, Machine learning, Convolutional neural networks, Deep learning
Abstract:	Facial expressions play a key role in non-verbal communication by naturally reflecting human emotions. Facial emotion recognition (FER) using computer vision has gained attention with advances in deep learning. However, deep learning models require large datasets to perform well, posing a challenge for FER tasks with limited data. Transfer learning is a promising approach to address this issue, but a standardized method for FER is yet to be established. This study optimizes three transfer learning models ResNet-50, Inception V3, and Xception on the FER-2013 dataset. Experiments include testing input image sizes, hyperparameter tuning, data augmentation, layer addition, and training methods. Results show each model requires different input sizes for best accuracy. Hyperparameter tuning improves accuracy by 6.35%, 4.69%, and 1.04% for ResNet-50, Inception V3, and Xception, respectively. Augmenting only the disgust class yields better accuracy than augmenting all classes. The freeze fine-tuning method is less effective than fine-tuning alone on datasets with thousands of samples but outperforms the freeze layer method. The best accuracies achieved are 64.89% (ResNet-50), 65.83% (Xception), and 66.40% (Inception V3). These findings provide insights into freeze fine-tuning limitations and guidance for optimizing transfer learning in FER with limited data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering (2088-8708) is the property of Institute of Advanced Engineering & Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Engineering Source

Description
Abstract:	Facial expressions play a key role in non-verbal communication by naturally reflecting human emotions. Facial emotion recognition (FER) using computer vision has gained attention with advances in deep learning. However, deep learning models require large datasets to perform well, posing a challenge for FER tasks with limited data. Transfer learning is a promising approach to address this issue, but a standardized method for FER is yet to be established. This study optimizes three transfer learning models ResNet-50, Inception V3, and Xception on the FER-2013 dataset. Experiments include testing input image sizes, hyperparameter tuning, data augmentation, layer addition, and training methods. Results show each model requires different input sizes for best accuracy. Hyperparameter tuning improves accuracy by 6.35%, 4.69%, and 1.04% for ResNet-50, Inception V3, and Xception, respectively. Augmenting only the disgust class yields better accuracy than augmenting all classes. The freeze fine-tuning method is less effective than fine-tuning alone on datasets with thousands of samples but outperforms the freeze layer method. The best accuracies achieved are 64.89% (ResNet-50), 65.83% (Xception), and 66.40% (Inception V3). These findings provide insights into freeze fine-tuning limitations and guidance for optimizing transfer learning in FER with limited data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	20888708
DOI:	10.11591/ijece.v16i3.pp1213-1226