New Building Envelope Materials for Energy Saving and Sustainability.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: New Building Envelope Materials for Energy Saving and Sustainability.
Authors: Cherif, Amel Soukaina1,2 (AUTHOR) amelsoukeina.cherif@enau.ucar.tn, Skander-Mustapha, Sondes1,3 (AUTHOR), Slama-Belkhodja, Ilhem3 (AUTHOR), Binwal, Shikha (AUTHOR) sbinwal@wiley.com
Source: Journal of Engineering (2314-4912). 6/27/2026, Vol. 2026, p1-19. 19p.
Subjects: Limestone, Construction materials, Building envelopes, Energy management, Sustainability, Energy consumption, Building performance, Wetting
Geographic Terms: Southern Europe
Abstract: The hygrothermal performance of building envelopes critically influences indoor comfort and energy demand, especially in warm climates where air conditioning represents a major energy use. This study evaluates a composite earth‐based brick incorporating crushed limestone aggregates, lightly stabilized with 8% cement and optimized for Mediterranean contexts. Laboratory and in situ tests demonstrate that limestone substitution improves compressive strength and water resistance, with optimal performance near 38% substitution. Though thermal resistance slightly decreases with substitution, overall hygrothermal behavior remains favorable. Water sorption–desorption isotherms and moisture buffer capacity (MBC) were examined under controlled conditions, with MBC expressed volumetrically (kilograms per cubic meter) rather than the standardized moisture buffer value. Sorption–desorption tests revealed that increasing limestone content reduces moisture buffering but remains within acceptable ranges. A peak MBC was observed at 10% limestone substitution, linked to microstructural rearrangement, enhancing porosity and moisture dynamics. Higher limestone content diminished MBC due to decreased microporosity and surface area, despite increased total porosity. Dynamic energy simulations, validated by experiments, indicate indoor temperatures can be reduced by up to 4°C during peak summer, with annual energy savings of 68 kWh/m2. An integrated environmental and economic assessment estimates a CO2 reduction of 9.9 kg/year and a simple payback period of 14.7 years based on electricity prices in Tunisia. While benefits per unit are moderate, their cumulative impact at the building scale is notable. This work bridges material science, hygrothermal performance, and sustainable evaluation, supporting further life cycle analysis to guide eco‐efficient construction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Engineering (2314-4912) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:The hygrothermal performance of building envelopes critically influences indoor comfort and energy demand, especially in warm climates where air conditioning represents a major energy use. This study evaluates a composite earth‐based brick incorporating crushed limestone aggregates, lightly stabilized with 8% cement and optimized for Mediterranean contexts. Laboratory and in situ tests demonstrate that limestone substitution improves compressive strength and water resistance, with optimal performance near 38% substitution. Though thermal resistance slightly decreases with substitution, overall hygrothermal behavior remains favorable. Water sorption–desorption isotherms and moisture buffer capacity (MBC) were examined under controlled conditions, with MBC expressed volumetrically (kilograms per cubic meter) rather than the standardized moisture buffer value. Sorption–desorption tests revealed that increasing limestone content reduces moisture buffering but remains within acceptable ranges. A peak MBC was observed at 10% limestone substitution, linked to microstructural rearrangement, enhancing porosity and moisture dynamics. Higher limestone content diminished MBC due to decreased microporosity and surface area, despite increased total porosity. Dynamic energy simulations, validated by experiments, indicate indoor temperatures can be reduced by up to 4°C during peak summer, with annual energy savings of 68 kWh/m2. An integrated environmental and economic assessment estimates a CO2 reduction of 9.9 kg/year and a simple payback period of 14.7 years based on electricity prices in Tunisia. While benefits per unit are moderate, their cumulative impact at the building scale is notable. This work bridges material science, hygrothermal performance, and sustainable evaluation, supporting further life cycle analysis to guide eco‐efficient construction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:23144904
DOI:10.1155/je/1007625