Geometry-Aware InSAR Feedback Purification Sampling for Negative Sample Selection in Landslide Susceptibility Assessment: A Case Study in the Shigatse Region.
Saved in:
| Title: | Geometry-Aware InSAR Feedback Purification Sampling for Negative Sample Selection in Landslide Susceptibility Assessment: A Case Study in the Shigatse Region. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Chen, Honglai1 (AUTHOR), Zhou, Chao1,2 (AUTHOR), Li, Yi2,3 (AUTHOR) liyi01@mail.cgs.gov.cn, Dou, Jie1,3 (AUTHOR), Chen, Yi1,2 (AUTHOR), Song, Yan1,3 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Remote Sensing. Aug2026, Vol. 18 Issue 15, p2591. 29p. |
| Subjects: | Sampling (Process), Radar interferometry, Landslide hazard analysis, Machine learning, Uplands |
| Geographic Terms: | Tibetan Plateau |
| Abstract: | Highlights: What are the main findings? We propose a geometry-aware InSAR feedback purification sampling strategy (GIFPS) for negative sample selection in landslide susceptibility assessment. GIFPS improves model performance compared with buffer-controlled sampling and dual-orbit low-deformation intersection sampling. What are the implications of the main findings? The results indicate that considering line-of-sight geometric sensitivity is important when using low SBAS-InSAR deformation to select candidate negative samples. The improvement of GIFPS is mainly related to reliability-oriented sample selection rather than excessive narrowing of the candidate sample distribution. Negative sample selection is a major source of uncertainty in landslide susceptibility assessment (LSA), because areas without recorded landslides cannot be directly regarded as stable. Small baseline subset interferometric synthetic aperture radar (SBAS-InSAR) deformation can provide useful constraints for identifying low-deformation candidate areas. However, in steep alpine canyon terrain, low line-of-sight (LOS) deformation may result from unfavorable SAR viewing geometry rather than true slope stability. To address this problem, this study proposes a geometry-aware InSAR feedback purification sampling strategy (GIFPS) for negative sample selection. GIFPS integrates ascending and descending SBAS-InSAR deformation, C-index-based LOS geometric sensitivity, and model feedback to select more reliable negative samples. The method has been evaluated in the Shigatse region of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau and compared with buffer-controlled sampling (BCS) and dual-orbit low-deformation intersection sampling (DOLIS). Repeated experiments using support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) show that GIFPS consistently improves model performance. Compared with BCS and DOLIS, GIFPS increases the mean ROC-AUC by 4.77 percentage points and 3.58 percentage points, respectively, and increases the mean F1-score by 3.75 percentage points and 2.59 percentage points, respectively. The ROC-AUC improvements are statistically significant according to paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Susceptibility zoning, SHAP interpretation, and sample-distribution diagnostics further show that GIFPS improves spatial discrimination mainly through reliability-oriented negative sample selection, rather than by excessively narrowing the conditioning-factor distribution of candidate samples. These results suggest that GIFPS provides an interpretable InSAR-assisted strategy for negative sample selection in LSA in complex alpine canyon areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Remote Sensing is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Highlights: What are the main findings? We propose a geometry-aware InSAR feedback purification sampling strategy (GIFPS) for negative sample selection in landslide susceptibility assessment. GIFPS improves model performance compared with buffer-controlled sampling and dual-orbit low-deformation intersection sampling. What are the implications of the main findings? The results indicate that considering line-of-sight geometric sensitivity is important when using low SBAS-InSAR deformation to select candidate negative samples. The improvement of GIFPS is mainly related to reliability-oriented sample selection rather than excessive narrowing of the candidate sample distribution. Negative sample selection is a major source of uncertainty in landslide susceptibility assessment (LSA), because areas without recorded landslides cannot be directly regarded as stable. Small baseline subset interferometric synthetic aperture radar (SBAS-InSAR) deformation can provide useful constraints for identifying low-deformation candidate areas. However, in steep alpine canyon terrain, low line-of-sight (LOS) deformation may result from unfavorable SAR viewing geometry rather than true slope stability. To address this problem, this study proposes a geometry-aware InSAR feedback purification sampling strategy (GIFPS) for negative sample selection. GIFPS integrates ascending and descending SBAS-InSAR deformation, C-index-based LOS geometric sensitivity, and model feedback to select more reliable negative samples. The method has been evaluated in the Shigatse region of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau and compared with buffer-controlled sampling (BCS) and dual-orbit low-deformation intersection sampling (DOLIS). Repeated experiments using support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) show that GIFPS consistently improves model performance. Compared with BCS and DOLIS, GIFPS increases the mean ROC-AUC by 4.77 percentage points and 3.58 percentage points, respectively, and increases the mean F1-score by 3.75 percentage points and 2.59 percentage points, respectively. The ROC-AUC improvements are statistically significant according to paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Susceptibility zoning, SHAP interpretation, and sample-distribution diagnostics further show that GIFPS improves spatial discrimination mainly through reliability-oriented negative sample selection, rather than by excessively narrowing the conditioning-factor distribution of candidate samples. These results suggest that GIFPS provides an interpretable InSAR-assisted strategy for negative sample selection in LSA in complex alpine canyon areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 20724292 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/rs18152591 |
