View in EDS

International Intercomparison of Specific Absorption Rates in a Flat Absorbing Phantom in the Near-Field of Dipole Antennas.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: International Intercomparison of Specific Absorption Rates in a Flat Absorbing Phantom in the Near-Field of Dipole Antennas.
Authors: Davis, Christopher C.1 davis@eng.umd.edu, Beard, Brian B.2, Tillman, Ahlia1,3, Rzasa, John1, Merideth, Eric4, Balzano, Quirino1
Source: IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Aug2006, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p579-588. 10p.
Subjects: Imaging phantoms, Tissues -- Models, Dipole antennas, Antennas (Electronics), Wireless communications, Telecommunication
Abstract: This paper reports the results of an international intercomparison of the specific absorption rates (SARs) measured in a flat-bottomed container (flat phantom), filled with human head tissue simulant fluid, placed in the near-field of custom-built dipole antennas operating at 900 and 1800 MHz, respectively. These tests of the reliability of experimental SAR measurements have been conducted as part of a verification of the ways in which wireless phones are tested and certified for compliance with safety standards. The measurements are made using small electric-field probes scanned in the simulant fluid in the phantom to record the spatial SAR distribution. The intercomparison involved a standard flat phantom, antennas, power meters, and RF components being circulated among 15 different governmental and industrial laboratories. At the conclusion of each laboratory's measurements, the following results were communicated to the coordinators: Spatial SAR scans at 900 and 1800 MHz and 1 and 10 g maximum spatial SAR averages for cubic volumes at 900 and 1800 MHz. The overall results, given as meanstandard deviation, are the following: at 900 MHz, 1 g average 7.850.76; 10 g average 5.160.45; at 1800 MHz, 1 g average 18.44 ± 1.65; 10 g average 10.14 ± 0.85, all measured in units of watt per kilogram, per watt of radiated power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility is the property of IEEE and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:This paper reports the results of an international intercomparison of the specific absorption rates (SARs) measured in a flat-bottomed container (flat phantom), filled with human head tissue simulant fluid, placed in the near-field of custom-built dipole antennas operating at 900 and 1800 MHz, respectively. These tests of the reliability of experimental SAR measurements have been conducted as part of a verification of the ways in which wireless phones are tested and certified for compliance with safety standards. The measurements are made using small electric-field probes scanned in the simulant fluid in the phantom to record the spatial SAR distribution. The intercomparison involved a standard flat phantom, antennas, power meters, and RF components being circulated among 15 different governmental and industrial laboratories. At the conclusion of each laboratory's measurements, the following results were communicated to the coordinators: Spatial SAR scans at 900 and 1800 MHz and 1 and 10 g maximum spatial SAR averages for cubic volumes at 900 and 1800 MHz. The overall results, given as meanstandard deviation, are the following: at 900 MHz, 1 g average 7.850.76; 10 g average 5.160.45; at 1800 MHz, 1 g average 18.44 ± 1.65; 10 g average 10.14 ± 0.85, all measured in units of watt per kilogram, per watt of radiated power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00189375
DOI:10.1109/TEMC.2006.877785