The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue.
Authors: McBurney, Peter1 p.j.mcburney@csc.liv.ac.uk, Hitchcock, David2 hitchckd@mcmaster.ca, Parsons, Simon3 parsons@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu
Source: International Journal of Intelligent Systems. Jan2007, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p95-132. 38p.
Subjects: Deliberation, Dialogue analysis, Participant observation, Intelligent agents, Computer network protocols
Abstract: Deliberation dialogues occur when two or more participants seek to jointly agree on an action or a course of action in some situation. We present the first formal framework for such dialogues, grounding it in a theory of deliberative reasoning from the philosophy of argumentation. We further fully articulate the locutions and rules of a formal dialogue game for this model, so as to specify a protocol for deliberation dialogues. The resulting protocol is suitable for dialogues between computational entities, such as autonomous software agents. To assess our protocol, we consider it against various records of human deliberations, against normative principles for the conduct of human dialogues, and with respect to the outcomes produced by dialogues undertaken according to the protocol. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Int Syst 22: 95–132, 2007. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Intelligent Systems is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Deliberation dialogues occur when two or more participants seek to jointly agree on an action or a course of action in some situation. We present the first formal framework for such dialogues, grounding it in a theory of deliberative reasoning from the philosophy of argumentation. We further fully articulate the locutions and rules of a formal dialogue game for this model, so as to specify a protocol for deliberation dialogues. The resulting protocol is suitable for dialogues between computational entities, such as autonomous software agents. To assess our protocol, we consider it against various records of human deliberations, against normative principles for the conduct of human dialogues, and with respect to the outcomes produced by dialogues undertaken according to the protocol. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Int Syst 22: 95–132, 2007. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:08848173
DOI:10.1002/int.20191