View in EDS PDF Full Text

Editorial: Standards for reviewing papers.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Editorial: Standards for reviewing papers.
Authors: Offutt, Jeff offutt@gmu.edu
Source: Software Testing: Verification & Reliability. Sep2007, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p135-136. 2p. 2 Charts.
Subjects: Editorials, Research, Standards, Philosophy
Abstract: The author reflects on the standards for reviewing papers for "Software Testing, Verification and Reliability." He shares some of the comments he got from the previous papers he submitted for review. With both positive and negative comments that he garnered, he was able to develop his own philosophy in reviewing. According to him, a paper should be rejected or accepted depending on its major results and not based on its presentation.
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 26368977
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Editorial: Standards for reviewing papers.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Offutt%2C+Jeff%22">Offutt, Jeff</searchLink><i> offutt@gmu.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Software+Testing%3A+Verification+%26+Reliability%22">Software Testing: Verification & Reliability</searchLink>. Sep2007, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p135-136. 2p. 2 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Editorials%22">Editorials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standards%22">Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philosophy%22">Philosophy</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The author reflects on the standards for reviewing papers for "Software Testing, Verification and Reliability." He shares some of the comments he got from the previous papers he submitted for review. With both positive and negative comments that he garnered, he was able to develop his own philosophy in reviewing. According to him, a paper should be rejected or accepted depending on its major results and not based on its presentation.
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=26368977
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/stvr.373
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 2
        StartPage: 135
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Editorials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Standards
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Philosophy
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Editorial: Standards for reviewing papers.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Offutt, Jeff
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2007
              Type: published
              Y: 2007
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09600833
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 17
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Software Testing: Verification & Reliability
              Type: main
ResultId 1