Spectrometric mixture analysis: An unexpected wrinkle.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Spectrometric mixture analysis: An unexpected wrinkle.
Authors: De Levie, Robert1 rdelevie@bowdoin.edu
Source: Journal of Chemical Sciences. Sep2009, Vol. 121 Issue 5, p617-627. 11p. 5 Charts, 3 Graphs.
Subjects: Spectrometry, Absorbance scale (Spectroscopy), Caffeine, Theobroma, Stimulants, Measure theory
Abstract: The spectrometric analysis of a mixture of two chemically and spectroscopically similar compounds is illustrated for the simultaneous spectrometric determination of caffeine and theobromine, the primary stimulants in coffee and tea, based on their ultraviolet absorbances. Their analysis indicates that such measurements may need an unexpectedly high precision to yield accurate answers, because of an artifact of inverse cancellation, in which a small noise or drift signal is misinterpreted in terms of a concentration difference. The computed sum of the concentrations is not affected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Chemical Sciences is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:The spectrometric analysis of a mixture of two chemically and spectroscopically similar compounds is illustrated for the simultaneous spectrometric determination of caffeine and theobromine, the primary stimulants in coffee and tea, based on their ultraviolet absorbances. Their analysis indicates that such measurements may need an unexpectedly high precision to yield accurate answers, because of an artifact of inverse cancellation, in which a small noise or drift signal is misinterpreted in terms of a concentration difference. The computed sum of the concentrations is not affected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09743626
DOI:10.1007/s12039-009-0075-y